GeorgeMonnatJr
New member
This is the middle part of my experiences so far with reef aquarium lighting continuing from my general thoughts on technologies (Part 1) with the end goal of how I measured my LEDs (Part 3).
As before, this blog is as much a place for me to keep my thoughts straight and engender discussion and something to refer to instead of retyping the same material a lot as it is a place to share information.
I'm not even close to being an expert on reef tanks, yet (maybe in a couple of decades), and I'm not a biologist or botanist. If you are an expert and you see something factually wrong please let me know, and I'll correct it. (Comments on my grammar and citation style will probably be ignored )
I do know LEDs and silicon-based photometers/photo-sensors (my title at work is Optoelectronic Engineer). I find myself re-posting the same graphs and explanations, so I figured I'd put it all in a blog that I can refer people to as needed. You can skip to Part 3: Quantum Sensors and LEDs if the background info is too boring.
Photosynthetically Useful Radiation (PAR)
So I wasn't interested in LEDs initially - until I learned about PAR (Photosynthetically Useful Radiation). I saw graphs for chlorophyll spectrum used in numerous places, like this one [5].
The first thing I noticed from the graphs is that very little of the green and yellow portion of the spectrum is used. That started me leaning towards LEDs, because they are ideal for hitting peaks and not emitting in "dead zones" like on the previous graph. The areas where chlorophyll doesn't use light, mainly 475nm to 625nm or green to orange, is used by things we don't want growing in our tanks. "Cyanobacteria and red algae have phycocyanin and allophycocyanin as accessory pigments to absorbe orange light. They also have a red pigment called phycoerythrin that absorbs green light and extends the range of photosynthesis [6]."
Apparently chlorophyll c is a bad thing as only unwanted pests like algae, cyanobacteria (cyano) and dinoflagellates (dinos) use it. "A third form of chlorophyll which is common is (not surprisingly) called chlorophyll "c", and is found only in the photosynthetic members of the Chromista as well as the dinoflagellates [7]." Apparently another concern is fucoxanthin, "the brown pigment which colors kelps and other brown algae as well as the diatoms [7]."
I hadn't found an absorption spectra graph for chlorophyll c (to avoid those frequencies/wavelengths), but then I stumbled on an awesome chart [8]. It shows chlorophyll c (pale red trace) in the bottom, middle graph with a peak to the right of chlorophyll a (black trace). It looks very close to chlorophyll b, so I'm guessing I can't filter it out. The chart also clearly shows that fucoxanthin used by algae and diatoms is in the green range and algae in general needs the green to orange light for photosynthesis, including phycoerythrin and phycocyanin.
Here's a question for you expert reefers: Do coral use phycoerythrin and phycocyanin or another chlorophyll accessory pigment? (feel free to post below) Phycocyanin especially seems useless to species living deeper than a few meters, so I'm guessing no. If not, then eliminating the green, yellow and orange light will help eliminate cyano and nuisance algae, because they do depend on those proteins, right?
Eliminating those colors, or wavelengths, means uglier coral that looks more bland - like most of my crappy dive photos with my cheap, little flash.
Just to see more than one source, here's another chart [9].
I don't want to go deeper into photosynthesis, because it's not my field. From what I've seen, I prefer lots of blue light (400nm-480nm). Some red (640nm-680nm) may also be useful, but species that live deeper than about 3m/10ft never see red anyway. Surface species like floating algae are more apt to use the red light to grow, which I don't want. The stuff I don't like uses the green to orange (480nm-640nm) light, so I only want just enough green/yellow/orange/red for color rendering to make my livestock look pretty to the human eye while maintaining healthy coral, anemones and clams.
After all that, I finally get to the purpose of this whole blog. How I use an affordable quantum sensor to more accurately measure the PAR of my reef aquarium LED fixtures.
Part 1: Technologies
Part 3: Quantum Sensors and LEDs
References
[5] Light In Lakes, 01MAY2012
[6] Hyperphysics, Pigments for Photosynthesis, 01MAY2012
[7] University of California Museum of Paleontology, Photosynthetic Pigments, 01MAY2012
[8] ATJ's Marine Aquarium Site, Photosynthesis, 01MAY2012
[9] Steve Berg, Winona State University, Chapter 15: Photosynthesis, 02MAY2012
As before, this blog is as much a place for me to keep my thoughts straight and engender discussion and something to refer to instead of retyping the same material a lot as it is a place to share information.
I'm not even close to being an expert on reef tanks, yet (maybe in a couple of decades), and I'm not a biologist or botanist. If you are an expert and you see something factually wrong please let me know, and I'll correct it. (Comments on my grammar and citation style will probably be ignored )
I do know LEDs and silicon-based photometers/photo-sensors (my title at work is Optoelectronic Engineer). I find myself re-posting the same graphs and explanations, so I figured I'd put it all in a blog that I can refer people to as needed. You can skip to Part 3: Quantum Sensors and LEDs if the background info is too boring.
Photosynthetically Useful Radiation (PAR)
So I wasn't interested in LEDs initially - until I learned about PAR (Photosynthetically Useful Radiation). I saw graphs for chlorophyll spectrum used in numerous places, like this one [5].
The first thing I noticed from the graphs is that very little of the green and yellow portion of the spectrum is used. That started me leaning towards LEDs, because they are ideal for hitting peaks and not emitting in "dead zones" like on the previous graph. The areas where chlorophyll doesn't use light, mainly 475nm to 625nm or green to orange, is used by things we don't want growing in our tanks. "Cyanobacteria and red algae have phycocyanin and allophycocyanin as accessory pigments to absorbe orange light. They also have a red pigment called phycoerythrin that absorbs green light and extends the range of photosynthesis [6]."
Apparently chlorophyll c is a bad thing as only unwanted pests like algae, cyanobacteria (cyano) and dinoflagellates (dinos) use it. "A third form of chlorophyll which is common is (not surprisingly) called chlorophyll "c", and is found only in the photosynthetic members of the Chromista as well as the dinoflagellates [7]." Apparently another concern is fucoxanthin, "the brown pigment which colors kelps and other brown algae as well as the diatoms [7]."
I hadn't found an absorption spectra graph for chlorophyll c (to avoid those frequencies/wavelengths), but then I stumbled on an awesome chart [8]. It shows chlorophyll c (pale red trace) in the bottom, middle graph with a peak to the right of chlorophyll a (black trace). It looks very close to chlorophyll b, so I'm guessing I can't filter it out. The chart also clearly shows that fucoxanthin used by algae and diatoms is in the green range and algae in general needs the green to orange light for photosynthesis, including phycoerythrin and phycocyanin.
Here's a question for you expert reefers: Do coral use phycoerythrin and phycocyanin or another chlorophyll accessory pigment? (feel free to post below) Phycocyanin especially seems useless to species living deeper than a few meters, so I'm guessing no. If not, then eliminating the green, yellow and orange light will help eliminate cyano and nuisance algae, because they do depend on those proteins, right?
Eliminating those colors, or wavelengths, means uglier coral that looks more bland - like most of my crappy dive photos with my cheap, little flash.
Just to see more than one source, here's another chart [9].
I don't want to go deeper into photosynthesis, because it's not my field. From what I've seen, I prefer lots of blue light (400nm-480nm). Some red (640nm-680nm) may also be useful, but species that live deeper than about 3m/10ft never see red anyway. Surface species like floating algae are more apt to use the red light to grow, which I don't want. The stuff I don't like uses the green to orange (480nm-640nm) light, so I only want just enough green/yellow/orange/red for color rendering to make my livestock look pretty to the human eye while maintaining healthy coral, anemones and clams.
After all that, I finally get to the purpose of this whole blog. How I use an affordable quantum sensor to more accurately measure the PAR of my reef aquarium LED fixtures.
Part 1: Technologies
Part 3: Quantum Sensors and LEDs
References
[5] Light In Lakes, 01MAY2012
[6] Hyperphysics, Pigments for Photosynthesis, 01MAY2012
[7] University of California Museum of Paleontology, Photosynthetic Pigments, 01MAY2012
[8] ATJ's Marine Aquarium Site, Photosynthesis, 01MAY2012
[9] Steve Berg, Winona State University, Chapter 15: Photosynthesis, 02MAY2012