ReefEnabler
Premium Member
I just read this one too:
http://www.advancedaquarist.com/issues/nov2003/feature.htm
If I am reading it right, giving a coral ~650nm (red) light without also giving it the correct balanced amount of 685nm ("far red") light could result in an imbalance between PS I and PS II and a loss in pigmentation.
But somehow picking up the "far red" light helps the coral deal with red??
That wasn't the main focus of the article so it didn't go into it as much as I had hoped. I'd really love to have more information on that, hopefully there will be some more studies
Looking at some of Sanjays spectral graphs for my bulbs, the radium 20k and hamilton 14k both have roughly equal spikes at
670 and 690nm.
Aquaconnect 14k has a TINY spike at 660nm, and then a decent one at ~685.
An XM 10k bulb has more light everwhere it seams, but the "far red" is more intense than the "red".
I wonder if this is why some of my Montiporas have gotten slightly lighter after replacing XM10ks with Hamilton 14ks.
http://www.advancedaquarist.com/issues/nov2003/feature.htm
If I am reading it right, giving a coral ~650nm (red) light without also giving it the correct balanced amount of 685nm ("far red") light could result in an imbalance between PS I and PS II and a loss in pigmentation.
But somehow picking up the "far red" light helps the coral deal with red??
That wasn't the main focus of the article so it didn't go into it as much as I had hoped. I'd really love to have more information on that, hopefully there will be some more studies

Looking at some of Sanjays spectral graphs for my bulbs, the radium 20k and hamilton 14k both have roughly equal spikes at
670 and 690nm.
Aquaconnect 14k has a TINY spike at 660nm, and then a decent one at ~685.
An XM 10k bulb has more light everwhere it seams, but the "far red" is more intense than the "red".
I wonder if this is why some of my Montiporas have gotten slightly lighter after replacing XM10ks with Hamilton 14ks.