jason2459
Well-known member
The main question for this thread is:
Why do I not need my CO2 scrubber now that I've switched from using limewater in my ATO to dosing limewater separately and ATO with fresh RO/DI water?
This is mostly out of curiosity of why something is the way it is currently with my setup.
Recently I've been playing around with a few things both of which are influenced by TMZ.
Technically I'm not dosing as much limewater anymore as my limewater dosing rate is slightly less then the evaporation rate. The limewater is now being dosed every minute for 1 second 24/7 which from what I calculate out to ~1.5 gallons per day.
My new setup and Apex programming can be seen here.
http://www.reefcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=24238460#post24238460
But I'll copy paste my last post in that thread showing my graphs in 3 different setups.
My theory is that the constant by the minute dosing is keeping the CO2 levels down much more efficiently then the periodic dosing of using it in the ATO where CO2 can creep back up faster and pushes the overall pH down more in the long run requiring that CO2 scrubber?
Why do I not need my CO2 scrubber now that I've switched from using limewater in my ATO to dosing limewater separately and ATO with fresh RO/DI water?
This is mostly out of curiosity of why something is the way it is currently with my setup.
Recently I've been playing around with a few things both of which are influenced by TMZ.
Technically I'm not dosing as much limewater anymore as my limewater dosing rate is slightly less then the evaporation rate. The limewater is now being dosed every minute for 1 second 24/7 which from what I calculate out to ~1.5 gallons per day.
My new setup and Apex programming can be seen here.
http://www.reefcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=24238460#post24238460
But I'll copy paste my last post in that thread showing my graphs in 3 different setups.
And with that above things are stable and awesome. This was all influenced by TMZ.
The ATO kicking in as needed I think just enough but not to much is nice.
![]()
But here's some charts I had to pull off the Apex directly as fusion doesn't go back far enough. These show how the CO2 scrubber helped and now with the consistent lime dosing its not needed and protects against one off daily spikes from events where humidity significantly drops.
Here's a graph of my system with using my kalk/lime as ATO no CO2 scrubber. It would dip just under 7.8 regularly at night. It most likely wasn't an issue and I could have continued with that most likely indefinitely
Limewater ATO alone
![]()
Edit: fyi those big dips 4 times there are my automated 4x per day feedings where my Apex shuts down my return pump/skimmer and feeds a mix of NLS Marine/AlgaeMax pellets.
But I personally would rather maintain above 8.0 if there's a reasonable and easy way which the CO2 scrubber is. This kept my pH above 8.0 consistently. I picked these dates as it shows what happens when humidity drops a lot and ATO kicks in more. It snowed quite heavily on the 24th here. pH would normally range with this setup between 8.0 and 8.3
Limewater ATO + CO2 scrubber.
![]()
Now that I have my ATO and Limewater dosing separate for some reason I do not need the CO2 scrubber and maintain in what I see as about as perfect range as I could be in with little effort of 8.1-8.2. Small swing and I image little to no alk spikes. Alk has maintained at 10 as it has been. The past few days have been perfect as well as its been snowing the past 2 days. So it shows 1 day of no snow and two days with snow with no significant pH spike like there was above on the 24th with limewater as ATO up to 8.5.
Limewater dosing 1s per minute alone. ATO separate. No CO2 scrubber. Snow last two days
![]()
My theory is that the constant by the minute dosing is keeping the CO2 levels down much more efficiently then the periodic dosing of using it in the ATO where CO2 can creep back up faster and pushes the overall pH down more in the long run requiring that CO2 scrubber?
Last edited: