Yup, both mediums and larges, and some have said the ones from LA do better than the ones from DD - not sure, but prices aren't bad for those sizes, plus one would anticipate treating no matter they got one, right?
However, Simon already picked one up (check out his other thread), so this has become a moot point for him...
I'm not in the habit of buying mags unseen, but absent any locally, I did get one last week from LA. They called it 'large' but I'd have called it medium - foot is about 4" across.
I think I made that comment in my other thread. I'm 3 for 3 (or, hope to be ) on mags from LA going back a ways, but 0 for 1 from DD. Tiny sample size, I know, so statistical significance is, well, not very good .....
I think I made that comment in my other thread. I'm 3 for 3 (or, hope to be ) on mags from LA going back a ways, but 0 for 1 from DD. Tiny sample size, I know, so statistical significance is, well, not very good .....
I think I have seen it mentioned several times over the past few months (including your recent thread), alluding to the fact that the treatment at DD is somewhat ineffective, so it is simply best to get them in more quickly from the wholesaler (LA via QM) and treat them yourself.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.