tinygiants
New member
My thanks to Spazz for sharing his performance numbers with me. Here is what I came up with from his numbers:
This information was provided by Spazz.
I calculated these numbers.
12.50% of air water column = .88 cubic feet
Air Dwell (volume average) = 23.48 Seconds
Air Bubble Rise Rate = 2.04 Inches / Second
Here is how my fine pore stones compared in a much smaller vessel:
13% of air water column = 0.09 cubic feet
Air Dwell = 9.67 Seconds
Air Bubble Rise Rate in Current = 4.96 Inches/Second
Calculated Air bubble Rise Rate Standing Water = 5.55 Inches/Second
The volumes are only important in the % aspect. Spazz achieved a 12.5% saturation. The goal is 13%. Look at the air dwell numbers. Over the same bubble rise height his bubbles stayed for 23 seconds. Mine stayed for 9. Look at the rise rate of the bubbles. My skimmer was a counter current model. His bubbles are 50% slower.
I am sure there is some room for error in this test, as they were not done side by side. However, I would have to say the bubbles from the NW are better suited for our end goal.
There is only 1 other comparison I want to make when I get the info.
Dale
This information was provided by Spazz.
Chamber Area 253.6 Inches Squared
Bubble Rise Height 48 Inches
Original Water height 42 Inches
Volume of Air 2.25 CFM
I calculated these numbers.
12.50% of air water column = .88 cubic feet
Air Dwell (volume average) = 23.48 Seconds
Air Bubble Rise Rate = 2.04 Inches / Second
Here is how my fine pore stones compared in a much smaller vessel:
13% of air water column = 0.09 cubic feet
Air Dwell = 9.67 Seconds
Air Bubble Rise Rate in Current = 4.96 Inches/Second
Calculated Air bubble Rise Rate Standing Water = 5.55 Inches/Second
The volumes are only important in the % aspect. Spazz achieved a 12.5% saturation. The goal is 13%. Look at the air dwell numbers. Over the same bubble rise height his bubbles stayed for 23 seconds. Mine stayed for 9. Look at the rise rate of the bubbles. My skimmer was a counter current model. His bubbles are 50% slower.
I am sure there is some room for error in this test, as they were not done side by side. However, I would have to say the bubbles from the NW are better suited for our end goal.
There is only 1 other comparison I want to make when I get the info.
Dale