OT: Roethlisberger better than Warner?

Dyngoe

New member
First off, full disclosure, I've been a Steelers fan since 1979 when I was five years old. No intent on bias here but I was debating someone on another forum about who was better: Warner or Marino. I think we all can agree Marino, but I couldn't get the other guy to see reality. Anyway, it got me thinking about who was better: Roethlisberger or Warner. On the surface it appears as if Warner would obviously win but I did some research and here's what I found:

Roethlisberger (career stats)
26.5 attempts per game
208 yds per game
.053 TDs per attempt
.036 INT per attempt

Warner (carreer stats)
32.6 attempts per game
262.3 yards per game
.051 TDs per attempt
.031 INT per attempt

It was hard to "fairly" compare these numbers because of the larger disparity in attempts so I took their standing averages and compared them as if they threw a comparable number of passes each game (32.6):

Roethlisberger:
256.5 yards
1.74 TDs
1.18 INT

Warner (same as before):
262.3 yards
1.67 TDs
1.04 INT

And, just for fun I also balanced and compared Tom Brady:
236.2 Yards
1.76 TDs
.77 INT

So, at the end I'm still wondering,"Is Big Ben better that Kurt?" I think there's no denying Brady lays the smack down on both of them.
:D
 
IMO, Warner is better, he's been on bad teams (Arizona before this year), when Ben's always been on a good team that's had a strong running game. Plus, Ben get's a big negative the last time the Steelers were in the SB- remember how he played terrible and the Steelers won *despite* him? He's improved since then though. In reality they're both pretty close right now.
 
I liked Warner I am Kinda of bias though I picked him up this year in my fantasy league on waivers 1st week (not drafted im my league) and he good enough to get me 2nd place He tailed off once mede the playoffs.
 
Warner, hands down. To be honest...I would have a hard time picking between Kyle Orton and "Big" Ben, Matt. You'll hate me for saying it, but Ben is one step up from a game manager. Not even in the Top 10 QBs...and possibly not in the Top 20.

Them is fightin' words, huh?

Go Bears. As in, Chicago. Ahem.
 
I think Warner is a bit better then BigBen. IMO, I think BigBen fit the system that Pit is playing, plus the Steeler's defense won so many games for him. He won't win that many games if he plays on a bad team. Same to Joe Montana, if he got picked by Tampa, do you really think Joe will go to Disneyland?
 
Brady was in a system that spied on other teams. At the level that these athletes are at, a little spying goes a long way. But back to comparing Warner vs. Roethlisberger. Teams playing Pittsburgh prepare for the run and pass, while teams preparing for Arizona prepare for just the pass. Warner in St. Louis was a beast when he had a running game and 2 prime receivers.
 
My disclosure, I haven't seen a bunch of Steelers games for obvious reasons. However when he came on the scene and got his first ring, he had next to no influence in that, that was all defense he just happened to be the lucky replacement QB who was in during the season. Then recalling all the crap he did after the fact because he got an uber swelled head (from the Superbowl and from falling off his bike without a helmet!) As such that's the majority of my view of him, having seen the game yesterday he looked leaps and bounds better than the Raven rookie QB but still didn't look terribly impressive, however that could have been due to the defense he was up against.

Warner, he had an awesome crew in St.Louis, and he has arguable the best wide receiver in football now as his main target, when Anquan gets into the mix he'll have his Jerry Rice/John Taylor type threat (if you don't know what that means, it seems means you're not a 49er fan :D) So the fact he has a great receiver might bump him up a bit statistically, but the fact his running game his kind of mediocre makes me think he's a for-real-deal type QB.

So forgetting the statistics I think Warner is a much better QB than Ben.
 
In his defense, Ben plays on a running style offense but that doesnt necessarily means they have a great running game. Until last year, Bens not had much in the way of backs but yet Pitt loves to run the ball. Some will say he had the bus but he had him towards the end of this career, where he was only good for short yardage and the occasional break. I think Pitt is so great because they are a highly disciplined team that knows how to control the ball and for the most part, doesnt make many bad decisions. They rarely do anything spectacular (other than Polamalu) but seem to find a way to grind it out and win. Goes to show you how important discipline goes in this game (read: pacman, Dallas, etc.)

So, back to the question of whos better. As much as I loved Marino, i think you could make a strong argument there (although in the end, i would probably pick Marino but Ben has a good 5 years left). Ben plays on a well balanced team, where as Marino was on an all pass team. Meaning, he had to pass. That leaves the question: if Ben passed nearly as much as Marino, would he be better? Not sure but hard to compare two different QBs, from very different eras, on very different teams. If anything, I think the more appropriate comparision would be Brady and Marino but even then, Bradys got all the rings. Marino has none.

Ok, so whos better, Warner or Ben. As great as I think Warner is, im going to have to go with Ben here. Warner has had a lot of success in his career but hes been about as inconsistent as any QB can be. If you recall, he was Benched over Leinhart (yeah, LEINHART!) last year. All in all, hes had a great career (dont forget the help of Bruce, Holt, Faulk) but I think the tie goes to Ben, given how consistent hes been his entire career, despite having been on mediocre teams. Even today, im not sure I would call Pitt a stellar team. They are tough and find ways to win games but there arent too many playmakers on the team. Sure Holmes and Ward are great receivers but they are neither the fastest or the greatest hands. They are very well coached and disciplined and play very hard.

So...ill give Ben the slight nod here, but thats no slight to Warner
 
Nice discussion guys. I didn't mean to confuse the issue by throwing in Marino and Brady. And, I'm not trying to sway opinion but see what everyone else sees. That said, I have a couple of quick points to make:
1. After the win in SB XL Big Ben was an idiot. I don't care if the accident was his fault or not.
2. Good points were made about the fact that Ben has had a good running game and solid defense backing him up. And, of course most QBs can't win without either. BUT...there is something to be said for teams with no defense and/or a running game (ala the '84 Dolphins and the '08 Cardinals). When you CAN stop the other team then there is no need to risk passing the ball and possible turnovers, you can just run the ball hard. So, it may be feasible that if Ben had no defense behind him he might need to throw more and possibly have higher marks.
3. BEN (not Big Ben but my friend Ben)...KYLE ORTON? Not necessarily fighting words but...Come on! I'll admit Big Ben is not the fanciest of QBs and sometimes looks like a goof on the field but you can't seriously consider he's anything close to Orton. I just watched three sports shows today ranking active QBs and EVERYONE put Big Ben in the top 5. Not hating Chi at all, but Orton is a hack compared to Ben. Sure Ben has not had the best year overall, but looking over his first five years compared with Orton? Seriously?

Thanks for the discussion guys. It's nice to have a break from water flow, chemical parameters and lighting now and then. ;)
 
I know you are kidding but I'll bite. You mean the guy Chicago thought wasn't as good as Orton? Grossman was a shooting star. One decent season where Devin Hester had five TDs and the Chicago defense had 4 TDs. Alex Smith could have won the Super Bowl with that much help. ;) Sorry Ben, but since McMahon there hasn't been a QB worth talking about in Chicago.
 
McMahon sucked too. We haven't had a QB since Sid Luckman.

I stick to what I said however - Ben wouldn't break my top 10. Warner, Brady, Favre, Brees, Rivers, McNabb, Cutler, Manning, Manning, Ryan - I pick all before Rothlisberger . And a bunch of others would be "pick em" - Romo, Rodgers, Schaub, etc.

He's middling at best and has always had a great team around him. The Steelers, really, should have won far more the last few years.

Blood boiling yet? It's just sour grapes, not making the playoffs. :-)
 
1 â€"œ I think Ben has a good argument amongst Brees, Rivers and Cutler. Sure, Brees was offensive player of the year but again, he is on a team that bases their entire offense on passing. Not to say he isn’t a great QB but to say that Brees is clearly better than Ben is unfair, IMHO. Brees has not shown he is a winner and outside of throwing TDs, im not sure hes good for anything else. Sure, passing for TDs is a big part of what a QB does but he isn’t a great leader, is immobile, cant win, etc. I used to look for all the numbers and spectacular plays but recently, I’ve been much more aware of the “intangibles” that make a good QB, great â€"œ that is, winning, being a great leader and being able to do all that without necessarily passing the ball.

With regard to Rivers, I think he falls into the same category as Brees, Great passing QB that is neither a leader or a winner. He also showed us very little in the beginning of the season and only caused a spark late in the season. He has Mannings poor performance, bad coaching the Colts (should have just taken the safety) and Sproles to account for much of his “success.” Again, great QB but IMHO, doesn’t have a clear nod over Ben.

I have Cutler as my fantasy QB so I cant say too many bad things about him but his late season collapse goes to show you how important stamina, consistency and leadership go. I will say that he plays on a pretty beat up team with absolutely no running game so to be as successful as he has been has been pretty impressive. That being said, I don’t think he has earned a place ahead of Ben…yet.

2 â€"œ How the heck did Orton and Grossman make their way into this discussion? Those are by far, two of the worst QBs in this league. In their defense, if that team had any receivers, they wouldn’t be so bad. I attribute much if their “success” this year to Matt Forte and I think without him, they probably would have won a game or 4 less. I think Orton and Grossman should thank Forte and that Bears Defense, for without them, they could have been nearly as bad as the Lions.

3 â€"œ Good point about the '84 Dolphins and the '08 Cardinals. True, sometimes QBs are “forced” to pass because of bad defense. That being said, I think its pretty clear that Warner is a pure passing QB and if he cant pass, hes not good for much else. Again, passing is what QBs do but if you put him on team that relies a lot on the run, it would probably throw his rhythm off. He is the type of QB that need to throw a lot.

4 â€"œ Not to take away anything from the Cards but I think they squeaked into the playoffs and got lucky with the teams they played. In their first game, the Cards played a good, but young and inexperienced Atlanta team. Ryan has been very impressive but lets face it, hes a rookie that will make rookie mistakes. He also came pretty close to beating the Cards so that should say something about his poise.

Next up, they played the Panthers, who went undefeated at home. All along, I thought Carolina was lucky to have been undefeated at home and but for a couple close wins, could have easily been a .500 team. Carolina also had a pretty easy schedule and lost to the “cusp” playoff teams â€"œ Minnesota, Tampa and Atlanta. All three teams had an inferior record. They beat Chicago, KC, Detroit, Oakland and Denver. Take away those “easy” wins and the miraculous game winning plays by Steve Smith and you got a 10-6 or 11-5 team. Still good record but still a “soft” team that got lucky with wins and strength of schedule.

Finally, you got the Eagles, who came on strong at the end of the season. After the OT debacle, McNabb stepped it up and finished the season strong but lets face it, the Eagles are not that great of a team. Im am admittedly Mcnabb hater but we all knew this streak was coming to an end. They got hot and rallied around Mcnabbs resurgence but we knew it wasn’t going to last.

5 â€"œ Ok, ive said way too much. Just haven’t seen a post on our forum here that ive wanted to contribute to in a long time. Hats off to Warner and Ben for making it to the SB. As much disparaging as I’ve done, I think that one of the most difficult championship game to make it to in any sport is the NFL. There is reason why good teams don’t stay good and there is a reason why we have new teams in the SB nearly every year. Easy win, luck or not, it takes a lot to make it all the way. That being said, I think Pitt gets another ring this year. I think that defense will shut AZ down. At least 2 of AZs TDs came on either blown or bad defense, something I don’t see a Pittsburg team doing. Boldin and Fitz are VERY good WRs and Warner has been able to just throw balls up there and let his players make plays. I don’t see that happening in the SB. Pitt will play ball control and play a very disciplined game, keeping the ball out of Warners hands and pounding that weak AZ defense. Im gonna go with a 24-10 prediction.
 
No boiling blood here, but I like the debate. I think you are crazy for not putting him in the top 10 when so many others put him in the top 5 but we all have an oppinion.

OK, let's break it down:
Ben - Five seasons in the NFL
Season 1 - 98.1 passer rating - 5th in NFL - Lost AFC championship to NE
Season 2 - 98.6 passer rating - 3rd in NFL - Won Super Bowl as youngest QB ever
Season 3 - 75.4 passer rating - 21st in NFL - IDIOT!! Hit a car and followed up with appendicitis
Season 4 - 104.1 passer rating - 2nd in NFL - Lost to SUPER NE Pats in AFC Championship
Season 5 - 80.1 Passer rating - 24th in NFL - Won AFC Championship and WILL win SB XLIII

And, here are his records in the NFL:
*Most Regular Season Wins in a Season, Rookie QB - 13 (2004)
Longest regular season win streak to start a career for a NFL QB - 15 games
*Highest Passer Rating, Rookie Season - 98.1 (2004)
*Highest Completion %, Rookie Season - 66.4% (2004)
*First QB to start two Conference Championship games in first two seasons in the NFL (2004 & 2005)
*Youngest starting QB ever to win the Super Bowl (2005)
*Roethlisberger became the second quarterback in NFL history, along with Peyton Manning, to register 3 perfect passing games during the regular season and only quarterback to ever register 2 perfect passing games in one regular season.
*Most wins as a starting quarterback in first 5 NFL seasons - 51 (from 2004-2008)

Now, SHOULD the Steelers have won more games in the last five years? Well, considering Ben's won more games than any other QB in his first five years then I'd have to say "probably not".

So, Ben, I have a hard time even seeing how you can call him a middling. Sure, this is not a hall-of-fame year for Big Ben but he is the #2 rated QB in the playoffs behind only Warner.
 
Alright, alright...so say he cracks the Top 10. He CANNOT be in the Top 5, that's IMPOSSIBLE. I know you guys gave him the fat contract, but in your heart of hearts, you know he's no Manning, Brady, Favre, Brees, etc. Now, all of that said, I'd take him on the Bears, no doubt. Just below a few others.

Good luck in 2 weeks...looks like the Cardinals are setting about imploding, so that should make it even easier for you.
 
you know he's no Manning, Brady, Favre, Brees, etc.
-Brady is probably the best in the league right now (if he gets healthy)
-Manning might be the best ever (Joe Namath said he was)
-Brees has had a great year but in his first five years he was nowhere near as good as Ben. It is only in NO that he has blossomed. Why? Let's see..no defense (26th) so the offense is always on the field and has to score points. No running game (28th) so he has to pass. And, the have a pass happy coach (#1 in attempts).
-Favre - AMAZING and probably retiring.

So, do I honestly thing Big Ben is in the top 5? Well, not this year in the regular season. But being #2 in the playoffs does say a lot.
 
Right...I'll stop poking the bear with the stick. What I don't understand, is how every team in this league (seemingly) finds franchise QBs on a vine...and yet the Bears...well...

Sid Luckman.
 
Yes, if that Bears had even a mediocre QB, they would be a contender every year. Look at the Ravens. At their peak, many would argue that the Bears defense was as good, if not better, than the Ravens yet both teams could not win until they got a decent QB.

I was/am a big Favre fan but I cant say that what he has done in the past couple years hasnt tarnished his reputation...a bit. Not sure whats happening with him now but he contintues to make some very questionable decisions and now, more so than ever, he seems to be making plays that even the worst rookie would never make, i.e. close your eyes, turn around and throw the ball in the air. That being said, hes still a hall-of-famer but at this point, I wish he would retire. Not because he cant play (even with all his faults, hes still better than half the QBs in the league) but because he continues to tarnish his reputation and I think its about time he hung it up. He has had an awesome career and he has nothing left to prove.

Yes, Brees was offensive player of the year, but im not sure how/why he cracks top 5 QBs in the league. Sure, there is a shortage of "great" QBs in the league now but I dont think his name deserves mention amongst Manning, Favre, or Brady. IMHO, he is a second tier QB...at BEST. The guy throws TDs. Thats it. Last I checked, it took a lot more to win than simply throw TDs. I think teams tend to play the Saints soft, esp. since most teams score on them at will. When you arent sure your offense can score against a defense, im sure you tend to tighten up. But if you know your offense will undoubtedly score, im sure defenses tend to let up a bit. At this juncture in thier careers, I would def. put Ben ahead of Brees.
 
Back
Top