<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=7032050#post7032050 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by E-A-G-L-E-S
point#1 - wrong
point#2 - wrong
point#3 - wrong
anyone that knows sports, knows just because you win "one" game doesn't mean your the better team! Your team has a collectively horrible day and the other has a collectively career best day, they are going to win "that" game....but that in no way makes them the better team. ya know? 
*and i hate gonzaga!
-JMO
Go Nova !!!
UCLA IS the better team. But only since Hollins has stepped it up. That was the one thing UCLA was missing for the first half+ of the season - a big man in the middle. They've had the rest of the package all year long.
And if you watched the game, you know UCLA came down on the wrong side of some seriously bad calls - one of the calls was a shooting foul - but it was actually the backboard that "fouled" the Gonzaga player (there was earlier contact when both players were going for the rebound, but the UCLA player was well off when the Zag had his chot blocked by the underside of the backboard - of course, it was UCLA's backboard

). On another (late in the game, when UCLA was close, the UCLA player was driving to the basket and contact was made (ie a foul committed) after the UCLA player left his feet in the act of shooting. The basket went in, but was ruled a foul BEFORE THE SHOT, so rather then 2 + one free throw, it was a one and one, which he missed.
It was that way all night. A good team finds a way to win in spite of those types of issues. In the recent past, UCLA wouldn't have won. Now they do. They were, and are, the better team.
Kevin