Overflow Flow Rate Problems

For overflow space, I do 1" per 100gph (thats from somewhere else here, not taking credit). That means that 1/4" slots and 3/4" teeth change this ratio to 4" per 100gph...so use teeth wisely. They do catch things that a flat overflow doesnt however. I have used both. If I use a flat overflow, I tend to glue an extra sheet of plexi 1/4" behind the overflow wall so that objects that are larger than 1/4" in all dimensions are kept out. With 1/4" teeth however, objects that are larger than 1/4" in more than 1 dimension are kept out. Make sense? Here, a wall w/o teeth and a 1/4" wall behind it can still have a tang go overboard if its' thinner than 1/4". With teeth that wouldnt happen as either its height or length would also matter. It could be trivial, but might not...depends on the critters.
 
Herbert:

Youve come full circle again. If the water is free falling, then there is no head pressure.

Regarding my overflow and it's safety feature... the wate level never changes. The safety feature does however add redundancy and save me of a snail or other debris block one of the intakes.

You say a durso should not have to be dialed in , but even Richard devotes many many paragraphs to explaining how to dial it in. Do you understand that the downturned elbow will acts as a siphon if the water level rises above the horizontal run? Do you understand that IF IT DOES NOT ACT AS A SIPHON, then the water flows over the upside down trap like a dam or weir? You either have a siphon/partial siphon or a free fall.

Once again if it is a free fall, them there is no head pressure. Sorry to keep beating you up over this but with each reply your logic becomes more incorrect with regards to the physics of the situation.

Bean
 
Herbert T. Kornfeld said:
Snap-On,
First of all, let me say that I love your tank. That whole tool-themed sump rocks.

Thank you for the nice comment. I've been away for a while doing other things so I'm just getting back to finishing it now. I'm going to be posting new pictures when I'm done.

A durso should function the same with the top T and elbow removed (besides the noise)...not like a carlson surge device. Something tells me that Bean's setup goes through this cycling, but he just doesnt notice because he uses a larger drainpipe than the bulkhead which is more accomidating. But if he ran 1" bulkheads with 1" pipe, it would be a different story...his overflow would most likely binge & purge and gurgle like mad. The only way to know for sure is to see a pic.

You are absolutely right. I can only assume then that there is a partial siphon being created. I would however say that it is at a bare minimum, seeing that we tune them to avoid the flushing affect. So simply put we are tuning our durso's for partial siphon without flushing. Sounds nuts, but it works. And I do see your point of how unreliable this is and how volatile, but in truth I don't have the expertise to think of something better. I do however have full faith in you to think of something for us. :lol: I would love to find a more reliable way if there is one. I'm counting on you buddy. :D (I'm serious, I know you can do it.)

And as far as the debate between you and bean goes, I'm now on your side because I like you better. LMAO :lmao:
 
The only things that end up in my overflow are snails. Shrimp, fish, large hunks of macro and other stuff can not flow over the edge. The water is to shallow and the velocit is to low.

I would agree that some overflows need teeth due to the large volume pump and short tank lenght or size limiting the overflow area. I would only use the teeth if your water is deeper than 1/4" or so.

We can open another can of worms here again if you want. I recomend an overflow the length of your tank with no teeth. You get great skimming and a nice look.

Bean
 
No, no, one can of worms is all I need...lol. I just hate it when fish can jump over the edge easily and get stuck in the overflow. I suppose yours is pretty shallow, but I bet some jumpy things get in there... Or even worse...a nice size snail will easily go over it...and could block the piping if it doesnt have a guard....even at that you still have to fish it out of there...
 
I don't have any jumpy things. My snails frequent the overflow and keep it clean. They crawl all over the intakes without a problem, they are screened with regular bulkhead strainers.

The overflow also house a little minijet that pumps water up to a fuge. The minijet has no efect on the overflow depth, as the water from the fuge drains right back into the tank (a loop).

Bean
 
Youre lucky that you dont have any jumpy things. I used to run all my tanks with open tops and hanging pendants...but everything, including emerald crabs, hermits, turbos, and fish were going carpet surfing.

Hey, doesnt that minijet run out of water if the main pump shuts off though (overflow box drains out too much)?
 
BeanAnimal said:
Teeth cut down on the skimming ability. I would only use them if the water dept over a FLAT overflow is over a 1/4 or so deep.

My water is less then 1/8 deep on my 75 gallons overflow. I am roughly around 1100gpm. The overflow is 4 feet long.



there is no way you are pumping 66000 gal hour? with T4 pumps
 
That was an obvous typo Bob. 1,100 GPH. Though if you want an 1,100 gpm pump I can get you one :)

Hernert: some brainiac stuff for you.

http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/bernouilli-equation-21_183.html


Please read the section labeled "Example - Bernoulli Equation and Flow from a Tank through a small Orifice" look under vented tanks and then the reference to Torricelli's Theorem. Good reading if you really do want to understanbd what goes on in these systems.

Damsel is caught... now off to clean up the mess.

Bean
 
I used to work with with some high volume high pressure pumps that do well over 100 GPM (6,000 GPH) at 5,000+ PSIG and water "trash pumps" that do over 100,000 GPH. I have used turbine pumps that will do several hundred feet of head at several thousand GPM. It's all out there if you have the money...
 
Yes, I am familiar with the Engineer's Toolbox...the only problem is that Eulerââ"šÂ¬Ã¢"žÂ¢s equation would have to be applied to every section of plumbing...using it just once doesnt work unless you have nothing but a pipe coming out the bottom of your tank.

The Bernoulli Equation was the main equasion used for that flow chart I posted earlier...obviously. There was another university website where a grad student was doing aquacultural research that not only involved the flow of water through an opening, but also the plumbing that would come after and its effects. I think the guy gradded and took down the site however. Sux, because not only did he have the most complete flow calculator I have ever seen, but he also gave the results with a computer simulation. You could pick the plumbing via a flash plug-in, input values, and then run the simulator.
 
I built 2 tank farms for Chevron from the ground up back in the 90's. (8) 25,000 gallon tanks with 10hp turbines and 15hp centrifical pumps for high speed loading and off-loading. 2 year project. I built the pads, set the tanks, set the pumps/turbines, plumbed them (dual wall containment), then placed all the safeguards(intelligent controls).Certified tech for INCON. Still doesn't help me from taking two weeks to figure out how I'm going to plumb a simple little reef tank:) Some of you reefers are using same diameter pipe as a 220v 10HP turbine. Turbine that fills your gas tank at the pump is only 5HP. @ $2.50 a gallon (ouch!). I've made 4 trips to ACE this week and I'll probably return over 25% of what I bought:) They need a forum here dedicated to plumbing...
 
I didn't tell you to apply the equation to to the system as a whole. I just mentioned it as a resource for understanding flow calculations. You have a tendancy to put words in my mouth or add meaning that I did not imply. I am aware of where the "table" comes from and never doubted it's accuracy. I have a problem with the system you are applying the table to.

I also wanted to make the point that Torricelli's Theorem plays a major role in these systems and the bernoulli equations are only a basic starting point.


I have a had a few high end fluid flow programs, but none could calculate the flow for the systems we are desribing (Torricelli's Theorem was one of the missing parts) Software to do this would likely have to be VERY complex and customized for each given "system simulation".
 
Do you guys know how many civil engineers have screwed up the sizing on pipeworks, culverts, sewers and storm drains because the do not understand the controlling mechanisms of pressure flow versus gravity flow? Many flooding problem are caused by the failure to understand the mechanics of the transitional flow.

A siphon is a form of pressure flow. A siphon is pressurized by potential energy in the form of water head instead of a tank or pump. A siphon is a form of pressurized flow where a negative pressure is generated and must be maintained by having a completely closed system in the vacuum portions of the system.

The laws of pressurized flow and gravity flow are two different animals. The transition between forms of flow are even more difficult to understand.

I will freely admit that I did not read very word of every post to get to this point but I will insert my two cents.

First, We all understand why siphons via normal hangon siphon overflow boxes stink. I will not even go there.

Second, Using any siphon for outfall in a tank is very dangerous and not a good idea. The only advantage is the increased flow (generally relatively small) it results in for equivilent sized piping as compared to a gravity system. The problem is twofold.

First, when your system loses power there is the possibility that the siphon will put too much water in your sump causing it to overflow. This is the same problem as with a normal hang on siphon overflow box. This problem can be overcome by having an extra large unused sump volume or trying to keep the top of the siphon close to the normal waterline so that the siphon is broken quickly. This is very difficult to do and normally results in the gravity/siphon surging (read more noise)previously discussed in the thread . This is not the real problem, however.

The real problem is that when your pumps come back on line, there is the high probability of overflowing your main tank. This is due to the fact that a siphon requires more "work" or potential energy to start than to maintain. This means that the water level in the tank must be higher to get the siphon started than to maintain it. This is not a small amount of head either relative to normal tank operating heights and freeboard. Typically, you see the gravity/siphon surging cycle for a while before full siphon occurs. This happens because the water height increases such that it is sufficient to partially start the siphon at the entrance. When the siphon partially begins it will begin to suck more water out than is available as extra potential energy. At that moment the air introduced will cause gravity flow conditions to occur and the cycle starts again. In the mean time you have caused your main tank to overflow at some point. Now you can overcome this problem by limiting your sump size or keeping the height of the water in the main tank so low normally that you can pump the entire sump contents into it without overflowing your tank.

These are generally not practical solutions.

There is a reason everybody uses gravity flow and a "durso", or valve at the discharge, or other means to limit noise. All of these mechanisms essentially try to increase the friction of, or headloss through, the gravity pipe work such that the flow through the system behind the bulkhead is limited such that it is close to the capacity of the bulkhead. This eliminates the ability of falling water to form small vacuum areas (or partial siphons) in various portions of the pipe which creates the noise we hate.

As to head on a bulkhead/orifice. In gravity flow systems, the head (water height) above the bulkhead regulates the flow. The orifice opening acts as a miniature pressure system. Of course if the bulkhead is not completely submerged it is a weir not an orifice. Water height still controls flow.

In a fully pressurized siphon system, the head has no significant bearing on the flow through the bulhead opening relative to the other controling factors. If the pressurized system is not a siphon, the flow has everything to do with the head and almost nothing to do with the opening.

Well that should muddy up the waters.
 
Its not that muddy...thanks for your input. I think what it comes down to is that Bean and I are just thinking entirely about two different types of systems like you speak...not that either of us is wrong...I can see where Bean is coming from based on the circumstances.

About calculations and engineers...you are correct...there are many things we cant take into account. Thats why 'flow through an opening calculations at a given depth' do not take into account the plumbing that happens once water passes the bulkhead...which in Bean's case I bet influences the system a whole lot more.

The only wat to prove anything for sure, besides hiring an engineering mastermind to work out the math on everything, or finding a computer program that could do all this...is to just set up various experiments and show the results.

While I'm at it can anyone tell me how to get photos posted in RC now...? It seems that it has been changed since I needed to last. Then I can post photos of my little experiment and some preliminary results.
 
Bean, the way a durso is supposed to work, you make the bulkhead the smallest point, that way you have 6-18" inches of water sitting above the bulkhead in the standpipe. That way, you have head.

The whole elbow thing is just to reduce noise, no other reason.
 
Back
Top