LittleBlueGT
New member
I had faith in you RANDY!
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=6899330#post6899330 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Randy Holmes-Farley
It is not a typo. The 0.08 ppm data is the new result that the EPA will publish, and is the reason for this thread. The other is the older, existing standard.
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=6902627#post6902627 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by mr pink floyd
im sure you can get ozone out of a cigarrete too colesy, i mean ozone is a secondary pollutant from car exhaust + sunlight, so tar and other carbinacious materials in cigarretes probably can make ozone too...
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=6908510#post6908510 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by yznhmr
you talk about filtering the exit air from the skimmer.. i have carbon on my Collection cup.. but wouldnt you get some that escapes through the water exit?
ok sorry i dont have time to read back but you guys speaking of our tanks and equipment possibly giving off ozone?<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=6907580#post6907580 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Randy Holmes-Farley
Is the .08 ppm number applicable for prolonged exposure or for short term exposure?
Long term prolonged exposure, as I understand it, but the whole study is not yet published.
r you saying that the sorce of this ozone can be from the heating of a home?
I'm not sure who you are asking, but it can't come from any normal heating system.
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=6911814#post6911814 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by mr pink floyd
... is easily broken up by CFC, chloroflorocarbons, which were foudn in old aresol cans.....
...... but i dont think ozone is a good idea. Its also very flammible....
still i wouldnt trust it