Petco Picasso "mislabel" thread

bues0022

New member
I've been noticing a surprising number of threads lately with the basic fact being "I just picked up a pair of picasso percs from petco for $10-$15/ea". For this to happen once seems rare, but it's not impossible for fish to get mislabeled, right? However, in the past few weeks there have been a lot more of these threads popping up. Also, if you think about it, the people on this forum are actually a minority of the number of people keeping SW aquariums, so think about how much this phenomenon has happened that has been going "unreported" to us.

This leads to the question: How is all of this happening?

I have several theories (not all my own, you know who you are who suggested these to me):

1) store-specific mislabeling. This one seems hard to swallow because this would require a large number of individual events in which a store employee placed what should be ORA picassos into a tank with much cheaper fish. OR, when placed in own tank the label was incorrectly priced. If this happened once, I can stomach this problem, but many times duplicated around the country? It not only goes to one person per store, but all the other employees/managers at the stores have the opportunity to see the price problem and correct it...yet this doesn't seem to be happening.

2)Franchise-wide price fixing. This could be considerably more possible. Petco as a corporation has decided to (in at least some certain markets) drop the price of very fancy clownfish in an attempt to gain back some customers. Getting a smoking good deal on a $100+ fish could offset greatly the terrible reputation of a fish-killing entity. Getting a customer in the door is huge to s store. Once there, the customer is much more likely to purchase additional fish, dry goods, frozen foods etc. (i.e. places where prices haven't been slashed). Even still, wholesale on a grade A picasso is somewhere around $45, so that would mean Petco would be loosing ~$30 per fish (yes, some assumptions are used here). That is a LOT of frozen brine shrimp to recover this much lost money and turn a profit.

3) Incompetent worker at ORA. It is entirely possible for there to be a new, or uncaring, or just plain incompetent worker at ORA that is packaging the wrong fish. An order comes in for percs, and they go to the nearest perc tank and put fish in a bag - not caring if they are true percs or picassos. They get sent off to the store where they don't care about attempting to go through the red tape to either send them back for the right thing (who sends back something much better than they were supposed to get?) or change the price (might even have to go up to corporate because of inventory change stuff). Therefore, they get put in the tank just like a perc and just figure some lucky customer gets away with a really good fish at a GREAT price.

4) ORA is knowingly messing with the supply chain. Thes last two possibilities are much more of a conspiracy-theory, so bear with my craziness. ORA has basically perfected the picasso clownfish by now. After multiple generations they have so many breeding pairs of picassos throwing so many picassos their supply is way up, yet demand stays the same. Fish aren't like boxes, and take money to keep "in stock" through food, water changes etc. They are accumulating a surplus of fish and don't know what to do. They are turning into the DeBeers of the fish world by massing all these picasso fish. Are they leaking a few out here and there to keep interest high? Putting some out the door and a few people "get lucky" would up interest in them. Think of this. You get lucky and pick up a pair for $20. Your buddy also wants a pair once seeing yours. He looks all over and can't find any but to have his LFS order a pair from ORA. That is a sale ORA wouldn't have had unless they "brought the expensive fish to the masses" through this "leaking" method.

5) OR, is ORA putting so many picassos out there at such cheap prices in an attempt to flush out all the other breeders? By dropping prices so drastically, who would pay $200 for a pair when you can go to petco and get a pair for $20? This means that most other breeders won't be able to turn a profit by raising picasso clownfish anymore and will give it up, leaving ORA to be the sole provider of "fancy" clownfish to the public. They will then be able to price fix to their desire (DeBeers theory again in a way), and even though there was a short stint of cheap picasso clowns, the end result is a more expensive market.


I'm really hoping this is just an innocent mislabeling on the part of several employees at petco and I'm just being more than a little paranoid to report the other cases. However, don't you think it's more than odd to see so many good fish sell for an order-of-magnitude less than they should?

http://www.reefcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1818757
http://www.reefcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1812617
 
IMO Its not mislabeling, they came to my local fish store too(not a petco)
spoke with the owner. The store knew what they were and sold them for $15 anyways because they paid so little. They were definetely sold to the store labeled as ocellaris. These fish aren't grade A and only a small percentage were close to grade B. I think that ORA with they're high standards couldn't sell them as B's and had so many they emptied the tanks. They labeled them as Ocellaris so as not to effect the Picasso market. Hoping that we would think it was mislabeling, or it would go for the most part unnoticed. My 2 cents.
 
I'm a little confused, because you mention that they were sold to the store as ocellaris - this would, in fact, then be a mislabeling by ORA since picasso is a percula, not ocellaris. Doesn't ORA also sell semi-picasso for those fish that don't make the B-grade picasso? I was under the impression that is where they dump them at. Perhaps with the picasso buzz-word people assume they are going to be expensive, and now ORA has thousands of semi-picassos that they can't move and hence the mislabeling and shippment. But that still doesn't clear up why they were sold to your LFS as ocellaris, that's the wrong species.
 
I thought you were suggesting that petco was mislabeling them. ORA definetely mislabled them. Semi Picasso are grade B, thus the "semi". There is no grade C these are culls. The LFS knew they were percula and sold them as Ocellaris anyways. To be honest they label thier tanks with the shipment list in hand, prior to fish being put in the tanks. Thats procedure at my LFS.
Only after did they realize they weren't Ocellaris. At which point they left the price and species labeling alone.
 
As I understand from an employee with Petco, West Coast Marine is the supplier for Petco now. They have been shipping these picassos marked Mis-bar False percs. This is the label on the bags. Who knows, maybe another group is trying to dislodge ORA.
 
why do anyone care if these were mislabel or not? if you find it, buy it. who cares? what r u gonna do? tell the owner to increase the price b/c it's Picasso? or call up ORA and tell them to correct their pricing?

i just dont understand the hipe.............

WHO CARES, JUST BUY THEM AND MOVE ON.

why spend the time to disect what is really happening?
 
Let's discuss politely. ;)

Maybe it's just a saturation of the market. I was in a Petco in Utah this week and I looked, but they didn't have any there.
 
I agree ... I seen these in IA at a petco... they are a low quality picasso at best... either way... I almost bought a pair... choose not to cause i wanted the best... OF COURSE!...

at any rate, petco's policy is what ever it comes in as is what it get sold as... I picked up a red sea tang(purple tang) for only $30 for this policy... if it works in your favor great... sometimes they will mark down the price if it isn't in your favor though... that depends on your petco though...

pink skunk your right just buy them and be happy... or don't ...either way i don't care i will buy a higher quality myself...
 
why do anyone care if these were mislabel or not? if you find it, buy it. who cares? what r u gonna do? tell the owner to increase the price b/c it's Picasso? or call up ORA and tell them to correct their pricing?

i just dont understand the hipe.............

WHO CARES, JUST BUY THEM AND MOVE ON.

why spend the time to disect what is really happening?

Try the other side of the bed the one your on isn't working out.:fun2:
 
I am not sure why people are discussing price policy of a supplier/vendor here. Who, except for the basement breeders trying to make a few bucks on "designer" clowns, would care?
 
WOW! I leave the thread for a few hours and people come unhinged. I was merely trying to start a discussion and find out what others' experiences were and try to see where things were at in the hobby. I completely agree, if you find them and like them, then buy them. However, I find that by finding out the root of the issue is more satisfying than blindly following the leader and accepting unknown reasons. If you see picassos at a petco or LFS mismarked, is it worth the impulse buy? what is the relative frequency this happens? Knowing the root cause can hopefully help everyone make more informed decisions.

I am not sure why people are discussing price policy of a supplier/vendor here. Who, except for the basement breeders trying to make a few bucks on "designer" clowns, would care?
EVERYONE! Every breeder small and large. Why else would ORA be selling picassos for any more $$ than regular true percs? BTW, it would also be nice to know that "basement breeders" actually fulfill a large amount of clowns in the trade. Any extra clowns that are bred are that many less fish taken from the wild.
 
Wait, are these actually picasso perculas or are they ocellaris?

Petcos I've been to around here (2 or 3 of them in the area, anyway) I've seen them label a tank of clowns as "Percula clownfish" yet they supply a scientific name of "Amphiprion ocellaris". As far as I can tell they are all ocellaris.

Are they now getting actual picasso percs and selling them as ocellaris? The black banding around the pair in the second thread make them look to me like ocellaris clowns.
 
i tried all 4 sides of the bed and yet still wake up with the same opinion, and that is: Who cares?

:rolleye1:

note to self: i need to stop participating in threads like these or i am becoming one of you :eek1:



Try the other side of the bed the one your on isn't working out.:fun2:
 
Knowing the root cause can hopefully help everyone make more informed decisions.

Why did not you ask ORA directly about the root cause instead of throwing wild guesses and conspiracy theories here?

bues0022;16816384[b said:
BTW, it would also be nice to know that "basement breeders" actually fulfill a large amount of clowns in the trade.
[/bold]

Care to share the source of this information, preferably with numbers showing what percentage of the market is taken by the basement breeders?
 
Ha! C'mon folks...if you don't like the thread move on and don't read it.

I think the OP has some interesting ideas. I just know one thing, I don't step in that place unless I need something for the "other" animals in the house.
 
i tried all 4 sides of the bed and yet still wake up with the same opinion, and that is: Who cares?

:rolleye1:

note to self: i need to stop participating in threads like these or i am becoming one of you :eek1:

Why comment if your not interested...?:crazy1:

As for the Petco clowns..... I too was sucked into this phenomenon. Went to Petco on Sun and was completely disgusted at the two Clarkiis' picking at the half eaten $0.50 piece-sized tang. Regardless of reasoning for this large occurrence of 'Picasso-like' clowns, I WILL NOT give business to a store that has this poor of conditions. This will only further their reign of terror on our aquatic friends. I'll stickt to the underground basement breeders when at all possible.

JMO
 
If you look at the picture of the fishes that user posted up, you will see that they are not even look like a grade B. I believe ORA just sell them as regular b/c they don't make the cut of grade B. Anyway, they look good though.
 
Back
Top