Please Recommend a Very Good Protein Skimmer for Small Sump (10" wide x 14" deep)

SkyReef

New member
Please Recommend a Very Good Protein Skimmer for Small Sump (10" wide x 14" deep)

Hey, all:

I heard that Euro-Reef makes a very fine protein skimmer, but I can't find one to fit in my small sump, which measures 10" wide x 14" deep. Actually, I'd like to use only a small footprint size of that available space for my protein skimmer: 7" x 7". Height is not an apparent problem because I have up to 20" available in height in the sump and cabinet space above the sump. Regarding types of protein skimmers, I hear good things about cone-design skimmers, but they seem to occupy a larger footprint, all things being equal.

Could you all kindly recommend a very good protein skimmer for my small sump? Ideally to fit in 7"x7" footprint, but I can go larger, if necessary. However, doing so will cut down on the other partitions in my sump, which I have yet to install because of the uncertainty surrounding the footprint size of my protein skimmer.

My relevant equipment specifications are as follows: (A) the sump in which the protein skimmer will operate is small--large enough to capture only 10.9 gallons of water, but I would like to operate the sump using only about 7.3 gallons, with 3.6 gallons reserved as an emergency overflow and; (B) the protein skimmer will need to skim the water of two small tanks, which feed water into the single, common sump discussed above: (1) a Nano Cube 28-Gallon Aquarium, functioning as a reef aquarium; and (2) a BioCube 12-Gallon Aquarium, functioning solely as a refugium.

In case you're wondering: The weird dimensions of my homemade sump result from the small, narrow dimensions of the cabinet space in my aquarium stand. The stand is that one that JBJ sells, with the brushed chrome-like pillars supporting a platform for the NanoCube 28. That stand looks good, but it produces a very tight cabinet space. Hence, when designing and building my sump, I had to go narrow, deep, and tall with my sump dimensions: 10"wide x 14" deep x 18" tall.

Thank you all very much.
 
The smallest footprint and height I've been able to find is the SWC (Salt Water Connection) Extreme Cone 120. This skimmer will more than handle the volume of water you have and then some. It also has a very reasonable price. I've been researching skimmers with small dimensions for a while. This is the one that fits your criteria.
 
The smallest footprint and height I've been able to find is the SWC (Salt Water Connection) Extreme Cone 120. This skimmer will more than handle the volume of water you have and then some. It also has a very reasonable price. I've been researching skimmers with small dimensions for a while. This is the one that fits your criteria.

Thanks for your detailed response, Eillie. You have made my search easier.
 
Thanks, Felix and Sasharotty. Your double agreement helps me.

No problem! The bubble blaster pump is great, and is shown to pull the most air out of any skimmer pump. The octopus skimmer design is great and very sturdy. These skimmers will not let you down!!! Definitely go with the octopus!

SWC cone would be nice also, but IMO go with the octopus!
 
My pleasure. To be honest with you I truly believe either the reef octopus 1000sss or the swc 120 will do as good of a job. The footprint is smaller on the 120 and you can easily take everything apart for cleaning. Another benifit to the swc is the adjustment is located high up above water unlike the octo. The 120 will also keep a good chunk of change in your pocket.
 
Hey, all:

Thanks for your input. Your suggestions were very good. After careful consideration, and based largely on the limited sump size I have, I went with the Salt Water Connection (SWC) XTreme 120 Conical Protein Skimmer. I purchased it for $224.99, the lowest price I could find. I was going to buy it directly from the manufacturer, via SWC's website, but I would have been overcharged for shipping--over $30.00. Instead, I purchased it through Amazon Dot Com (who will get it from TB Aquatics), and shipping will only cost like $7.95 instead. Estimated delivery will be about 3-5 business days. Thanks again.
 
No problem, have heard nothing but good things also about the other skimmers mentioned just no expierence with them.But the bubble blaster def is a great pump! Plenty of threads here on the SRO's and bb's.Do a search on them and you could probably read for a day lol.
 
No problem, have heard nothing but good things also about the other skimmers mentioned just no expierence with them.But the bubble blaster def is a great pump! Plenty of threads here on the SRO's and bb's.Do a search on them and you could probably read for a day lol.

Thanks for your follow-up response, Sasharotty.

You raise a good point. I definitely wanted to go with the SRO-XP 1000 SSS, for sure. However, its size caused me to go with the other choice, the SWC Xtreme 120. The SRO has a footprint of 9.5" x 7.5". That footprint was just a little too big for my sump. It would have pushed my input-chamber walls into a different area of the sump. On the other hand, the SWC Xtreme 120 has a smaller footprint of 7.25" x 6", which will allow my original sump-chamber-walls design to work perfectly, without re-modification.

But, thanks again for your very good suggestion. Maybe when I remodel my larger tank, I'll go with the SRO, if my sump plans for that tank allow the larger footprint.
 
Back
Top