POLL: Which size tank would you get?

[reefer91]

Standard 120 is a classic tank size. You can't go wrong.

 

[t4zalews]

48x24x24, you're already submitting to not having tangs. So much better footprint for rock placement in terms of corals.

 

[DHyslop]

Seems to be some confusion about the word depth. Tank dimensions are L x W x H. When I use the word depth I mean W. So I'm recommending the 4 x 2 x 2 because it has greater "depth" = width.

 

[edsbeaker]

Seems to be some confusion about the word depth. Tank dimensions are L x W x H. When I use the word depth I mean W. So I'm recommending the 4 x 2 x 2 because it has greater "depth" = width.

No confusion here. I also use the word "depth" in place of "width". We are talking about the measurement from the front of the tank to the back, not the height of the tank.

 

[DM1975]

Always always always get the next size up. If having a Tang is a priority then get the longer tank.

 

[Travis590]

If cost is a concern to you then I would stick with the 4 ft tank because I would assume you are doing a reef going with the 5 foot tank would cost you more for lighting adding to the cost of the initial start up. Just my 2 cents though.

 

[greg1786]

I just upgraded from a four foot tank to a six foot 125 gallong. Its only 18" deep but i dont think the aquascaping situation is really as terrible as everyone is saying, i feel as though i have plenty of depth to do what i want. And the added length is so much nicer. Just my opinion but in reality i think you should just take some time to decide what you want to do livestock wise. If keeping larger fish is a must go with the five foot tank. If you are more concerned with having more room for rockwork and coral space go with the deeper tank. Its really what YOU have to like because your the one whos going to be enjoying it. Also in regaurds to saving money on the light fixture due to a shorter tank i disagree. The difference in depth will mean you need more bulbs for front to back coverage so ultimately youll be spending equal money. Good luck with your decision!!

 

[DM1975]

I have a six foot 125g also and it is built as a peninsula and I have plenty depth on each side. It is tight in a few areas, but I still have plenty room for rockscaping and coral placement.

 

[edsbeaker]

Hi all,
Thanks again for all the comments, but I'm going with the 4' deeper 120G. For me it seems the benefits of the depth outweigh the few additional fish that I could choose for the 5' length.

I think if I had the space for the 6', then the benefits of so many more fish choices would change my decision and I would get a 125, but unfortunately, since my space is limited it's not in the cards for me to do.

 

[dave sullivan]

Most definitely go with the 24x24x48. The wider your tank the better. You will get more gas exchange with a wider tank than a narrow. Also, your landscape will look more natural in the 24 inch space opposed to the 18 inch. Have a great day!

 

[SGT_York]

Love my 4x2x2, IMO it's all about the corals anyway.

 

[rsaha]

Love my 4x2x2, IMO it's all about the corals anyway.

Yup. I've had mine for 7 years and the only thing I want is more depth - but I have resigned myself to no tangs...

 

[PistolShrmp]

get the 120. The extra depth will facilitate a creative aquascape with visual depth. It will also be easier to keep clean because there will be more space between the rock and the back pane. Finally, the proportions of the viewing pane are closer to the "golden rectangle" which is most pleasing to the eye.

+1

 

[echoreef]

Definitely go with the 4x2x2. It's one of the most popular size tank for something big but not too big. The extra width is great for aquascaping instead of having a row of rocks. I like it so much, my tank is that size.

 

[jimmy n]

Consider A2 plus b2 = c 2 when considering the size of your tank. I'd go with the 120. The 18 depth over the 24 inch depth is a huge sacrifice for 1 foot in length.

 

[GroktheCube]

4'x2'x2'

4' tanks are easier to light, and 2' depth is much better for aquascaping. When you have 2', it's much, much easier to create good forced perspective to make the tank look deep.

I'd only consider going up to a longer tank if it were also 2'+ front to back.