<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=12646129#post12646129 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by 95accord
i dont QT. I find the fish i get are stressed out enough as it is. I usualy try and get them right as they arrive at my LFS so that they dont get a chance to contract anything from those tanks.
i tried QT'ing a couple clowns i got and they only got worse.
i know i should but i dont have space/time/money to set up a good QT tank. anything i could do at this point would probably just make my fish worse. mind you im extremely picky when i go to my LFS and i ensure to get nothing but the healthiest specimens.
Sorry but IMO that is a huge excuse.
There is nothing more stressful about putting a fish in QT then placing it in your display. In fact it is probably less stressful for the fish as it is in a tank by itself instead of having to deal with other fish as well.
That argument just doesn't hold water, it's getting kind of old.
The only reason we see this excuse is because people use excuses when they know they are not doing what they should.
I QT everything. Rock, fish, corals, snails, macro algaes, if it's wet it gets QT'd.
I've never ahd a parasite outbreak in my systems. I've never had ich in my display. Never had an acro eating flat worm. If I did it would cost me thousands, much more then my QT costs.
My QT is kinda more then most. I have a skimmer, a UV, a sump, it's kinda nice. Everything goes in it for 6 weeks min, must of the time more.
QT a fish for 2 to 4 weeks, isn't going to protect you much.
Saying your LFS Qt's your fish, ya doubt it. With how many other fish, under what conditions? I've been to several LFs's (more then 30) never seen one with a real QT setup. Never. It costs to much for the LFS to do that, just the cost of doing business.
There are to many posts on this forum about problems that are completely avoidable. It's kind of sad. If we can't be responsible for what we keep we have no business keeping it.