Re: Re: question about cycling
Re: Re: question about cycling
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=7691337#post7691337 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by gcarroll
During cycling, it is important to have the skimmer running to remove waste and nutrients from die-off to limit the cycling in the first place.
I guess this depends on what you consider the goal of cycling.
If you remove the waste before it breaks down, the nitrifying bacteria won't have "much" food, and therefore the colony established is that sufficient to care for an unfed tank with skimming.
The first time you put a fish (or any other load, for the sake of argument), you'll see a modest spike as the waste not skimmed exceeds the capacity of the very small colony created during cycling. This is contrary to the goal of traditional cycling - the idea is to build a sufficient bacteria colony such that any single new fish addition is unlikely to cause any measurable spike. This is why many people propose using large, whole shrimp to create a significant load. Skimming that load before it can break down is counterproductive.
On the other hand - IF you know what you're doing, you're good with water changes, and you've got sufficiently strong skimming and circulation, you can probably skip the traditional cycling altogher provided you use sufficiently live rock and/or sand.... of course, this only works if you fill all the requirements, and if you're at that point, you're not looking for advice on cycling a tank anyway
