RBTA Tank - 40L - VHO or T5?

tanglovers

New member
Hi All,

I am considering setting up a tank for a RBTA. The tank would be a 40L (48x12x16H). I am looking for opinions on which lighting would be better. VHO or T5. Reguardless I would be looking to run four 4' bulbs on an IceCap 660.

I am considering VHO because I have all the endcap etc already. T5 because of the lower watts/brighter look.

Any suggestions? The tank would be set up with the rose and a pair of clowns being the only inhabitants.

Was planning on T5 until I wnet through the TOTM archieve and read Anemone's tank right up and read VHO...then got to thinking about it.

Thanks!
 
Well I appreciate the info. I already have the ballast (Icecap 660) and endcaps (I actually have VHO and T5 endcaps). If I go the T5 route I will need to get reflectors and bulbs, if I go the VHO route just bulbs.

The plus' and minus' I see are:

VHO Higher wattage use

T5 brighter (higher PAR - maybe?)

T5 I have had issues with bulbs overheating and burning out prematurely never had this issue with VHO

Higher evaporation with T5 - associated with the more fans I would run to keep the bulbs cool.


But the biggest question is what would the anemone like the best or do the best under? All other things I can deal with - higher costs etc.
 
Hate to burst the bubble but you need to run some cooling with VHO anyway. Queston whether you can go HO instead of VHO is the issue.
 
From what I understand, T-5 with individual reflectors gives you deeper water penetration than vho. Your tank isn't especially deep (16 inches), so either vho or T-5 should be okay--actually will certainly be fine with a RBTA. If you were going to keep higher light demanding species or soft coral, you would maybe lean toward the T-5. If you do go the T-5 route, I would suggest the individual reflectors though, so you will be getting the maximum effect of the bulbs.
 
Back
Top