Yes, the advantage is well worth the risk. I have had more than several meltdowns in the past 2 years and have learned a great deal as to what goes wrong, how to fix it, and how to prevent it in the future. However there is no better way to get enough calcium in a reef system especially SPS than to run 1 or both reactors IMO. You can dose a 2 part additive but in time your animals will require far more Calcium than 2 part will be able to keep up with.
Do you need a reactor? If so what kind?
Good question, only you know the answer to that question though. Do you have or plan to have a lot of stony coral like SPS, or LPS? If so then yes you will likely have to invest in a reactor one day. You can begin your system with a few LPS or SPS and you can add calcium manually for a while. If all is going well and your coral are growing, usually about 6 month to a year in you will begin to notice something happening. It takes more and more calcium additive to keep your Ca to the "normal level." That's how balance works, your coral are used to a set amount of pH, Alk, Ca etc and they require more and more.
You can start off with a Kalk reactor, they are a bit less expensive and they maintain the Ca pretty well in a lightly stocked system. They work by stiring Kalkwaser or lime mixing with fresh top off water and injecting into the system. This has serious dangers. If however you decide to keep more variety of stonies you will have no choice but to add a suplimental reactor in this case a Co2 Ca reactor. A calcium reactor works buy lowering the pH in the reactors chamber to dissolve a media and releasing, you guessed it calcium.
If you have a seriously stocked system like Rogers tank, you need both reactors working in conjunction to maintain the uptake. Use every concievabel saftey precaution when dealing with both reactors. Solenoids to shut off the Co2 tank on power outages, pH controllers on both Kalk and C02 Ca Reactors.
More on this later....
Phil feel free to fill in some blanks.