Recent CITES update (Coral Trade Regulation)

DEEP BLUE SIX

New member
Nations reject coral protections at wildlife conservation conference

Environmentalists and scientists argue that corals, which are living animals and seriously threatened by rising carbon dioxide emissions that are warming the ocean and making it more acidic, cannot afford the added pressure of a commercial harvest. Nearly 30 percent of the world's tropical coral species have disappeared since 1980, mainly because of warming, and an even larger percentage may have disappeared by the end of the last century.

Tom Strickland, assistant secretary of the interior for fish, wildlife and parks, spoke out for regulating the coral trade. Passage in CITES requires two-thirds of the delegate votes, and the measure failed on a secret ballot with 64 in favor, 59 opposed and 10 abstaining.

"Although the proposal did not gain the two-thirds majority of votes necessary to be adopted, the U.S. is encouraged by the fact that the majority of the parties voted in support of the proposal," Strickland said.

"Corals are the building blocks of many ocean ecosystems, and the science is clear: They are at great risk," said Dawn Martin, president of SeaWeb. "And now, since action was not taken at CITES, red and pink coral populations will continue to decline at an alarming rate."

The description of Red & pink corals does not really get into specific species, although according to the article, it does elude to that fact that most of this is based on the "coral jewelry market".

Some jewelers and home decor companies, such as Tiffany and Temple St. Clair, have voluntarily stopped selling corals for environmental reasons.

Either way, I found it interesting. LINK BELOW:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/21/AR2010032101204.html

How much further may things effect the reef aquarium hobby trade?

Anyone heard anything more on the recent endangered species list and proposal to ban collection?

Just curious.
 
Last edited:
I do not know what to think about this,I agree coral reefs need to be protected..But the only people that seem to have a voice at the table are people that are extreme one way and extreme the other way and will not give a inch..
 
Personally,
I am for "controlling / diminishing" carbon emissions and other forms of pollution. Simple "trash" in the Pacifc ocean such as plastics are a big problem. As well as oil spills...

I like alternative energy autos and "green" sources of energy.

But I'm not for limiting coral collection. As long as it is controlled.

However, unfortunetly though-
it does not really matter what little people think. It's the big people scratching each others back and so forth. All about money really. What's in it for them... If it's a payoff of some sort or a vote or an investment coming... then your on the side that is going to win. That's why sensible decisions for the overall good for everyone are hard to come to. It's always an arguement of these sides against those sides.. 'Cause what is better for the "pocket book" so to speak, in the big money world, rules over the good of balance.
 
Back
Top