Makes a lot of sense. Maybe I should have more pictures. The caves are a bit hidden and can better be seen from the sides. I was shooting for two "island" style set-ups but I didn't want to short the rock from the 1 lb. per gallon recommendation.
I guess my next question would be in order to gain that kind of scaping, would it be ok to be on the short side of lbs. per gallon?
pounds per gallon isnt a good "rule".
its kind of variable. if you have a sump, you can keep 100 lbs of liverock in there and 1 rock in your DT and see no difference than if it was 90 lbs in your DT and 10lbs in your sump.
I didn't really calculate pounds per gallon i just scaped til i liked it and dump whatever else i had in my sump.
the pounds per gallon "rule" is inaccurate, the most important aspect is really how much surface area you have for bacteria to grow.
you can have a boulder in your tank that weight 100 lbs and have less surface area then a bio pellet that weighed 1 gram LOL
porous rock is more important for surface area, weight is not really relevant
also as a side note, and we have teh same tank so i have already went through every possible thing, when you realize you ned more flow, dont get more cheapies, go for the vortech mp10.
youll end up spending more money over time and not get what you really need than if you went and got the right thing off the bat.
i am ordering my vortech pump next week and I cant wait to get all those bulky powerheads out lol