macclellan
New member
Dana - I take it you're adding an angel to the 300? That would be sweet and a nice contrast to your other fish.
Donnie - I checked out that article and see the moves you were talking about - neat!
Donnie said he was nerding out; it's academic "rambling" (Galileo supported Copernican and both were heliocentrists, by the way). This ETRC forum occasionally has detours in its threads. Surely there's a slew of other threads on reef-safe angelfish with the lists of species and anecdotes you seem to be looking for, particularly in the "reef fishes" forum.
Donnie - I checked out that article and see the moves you were talking about - neat!
The original point that started the detour was that phylogenetics - the study of the evolutionary relatedness of organisms - might provide a systematic answer to the question "Which angels are reef-safe?" that would be both helpful for aquarists and interesting in its own right.Again, what on Earth are you people talking about? I thought the topic here was reef safe angelfish. I do get your Galileo vs Copernican metaphor, and associated ramblings, but what has that to do with reef safe angel fish? I'm so confused. My mom said I could talk about angelfish here, not angels. This has nothing to do with anyone's world views. I will check with her again.
Donnie said he was nerding out; it's academic "rambling" (Galileo supported Copernican and both were heliocentrists, by the way). This ETRC forum occasionally has detours in its threads. Surely there's a slew of other threads on reef-safe angelfish with the lists of species and anecdotes you seem to be looking for, particularly in the "reef fishes" forum.