refactometer or digital type probe

[Dolfan]

I was considering a refractometer but also saw this and wondered if anyone is using something like this?

digital probe

Sure looks like it would be quicker and easier, if these are accurate then I would think this is a better route to go as the cost is similar.

 

[240-Reefer]

I have a refracto and it is great, but I often debate picking up a pinpoint.

 

[Dolfan]

I hear more about the refracto than the meters. I understand that with the pinpoint as they are about $50 more than a refracto, but something like this seems to be about the same price.

I would have to guess that if it is accurate it would be a good step up from a swing arm device.

 

[Alaskan Reefer]

I would get a refractometer and skip the probe -- for me a mechanical system is much less prone to any failure or loss of calibration and it only costs you maybe another 10 seconds each time you test.

 

[Dolfan]

I guess as a person who has never used a refractometer it sure seems like the probe would be completely "user proof". I guess what you are saying is that using the refracto isn't really difficult, or time consuming.

Any more thoughts from folks using either method.

 

[xtrstangx]

I'm kind of wearing buying "lab grade equipment" on eBay. I bet that thing breaks in a month.

I'd say go with a refractometer.

 

[Dolfan]

OK, looks like the votes swing for the refracto device. Anyone else with input???

 

[Pinksteel]

Refactometer is a great way to check salinity(very accurate), and the great thing is you don't need to clibrate it nearly as often