thrillreefer
New member
I recently returned from my honeymoon to the Fiji Islands and I had an experience related to responsible reefing that I had to relate. We stayed for 4 nights at Oarsman's Bay Lodge on Nacula Island (had an excellent time) and met the owner of the resort who is also the tribal chief of the entire Nacula Island where the resort is located. It's in the Yasawa group, but is a decent sized island (approx. 10 km long and 6 km wide) for the group.
Upon meeting the chief, we discovered that the reefs on fully half of the island are protected by his enforcement of a taboo on any fishing or collecting activities. This includes all fish, coral, live rock, inverts, etc. for any purposes. And the taboo is working: we saw here by far the healthiest corals (at least 95% were devoid of any bleaching, much better than other areas we visited), healthy stocks of fish including predatory fish, sharks and stingrays. According to him and others on the island, the taboo has been overwhelmingly adhered to and successful.
The taboo was enacted 7 years ago voluntarily and was initially fairly unpopular because it drastically reduced the fishing grounds for 4 local villages on the islands. But local support has grown for the taboo due to increased tourism, probably through word-of-mouth about the health and beauty of the reefs of the island. I was wondering if such progressive local reef management has been noticed elsewhere by other travelers, or if this is a fairly unique occurrence in tropical island countries?
Just wanted to share the experience, and support Nacula Island and Oarsman's Bay resort for their responsible reef management...
Upon meeting the chief, we discovered that the reefs on fully half of the island are protected by his enforcement of a taboo on any fishing or collecting activities. This includes all fish, coral, live rock, inverts, etc. for any purposes. And the taboo is working: we saw here by far the healthiest corals (at least 95% were devoid of any bleaching, much better than other areas we visited), healthy stocks of fish including predatory fish, sharks and stingrays. According to him and others on the island, the taboo has been overwhelmingly adhered to and successful.
The taboo was enacted 7 years ago voluntarily and was initially fairly unpopular because it drastically reduced the fishing grounds for 4 local villages on the islands. But local support has grown for the taboo due to increased tourism, probably through word-of-mouth about the health and beauty of the reefs of the island. I was wondering if such progressive local reef management has been noticed elsewhere by other travelers, or if this is a fairly unique occurrence in tropical island countries?
Just wanted to share the experience, and support Nacula Island and Oarsman's Bay resort for their responsible reef management...