<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=6631897#post6631897 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Sindjin
Rock Cooking, IMO is an easier, faster, cheaper method of Curing your rock. Thats it.
Will it aid in giving someone with poor husbandry practices a new start? Yes...but it wont cure the poor husbandry practices. We all know this. Will it help to give a newb an easier foundation to work from when setting up a new tank? Yes.
Why does it give an easier foundation?
I guess that's where Ihave issues with this method - that it's portrayed as `easier, faster, cheaper'.
How is it cheaper than normal cycling? [IMO, probably more expensive given longer period + more water changed]
How is it faster, as cooking [per recommendation] is a longer process than the standard curing? [seems like this is obviously contradictory, as cooking would require more time `post initial cure' for nutrient removal]
How is it easier than normal curing? Seems potentially more labor intensive, or equivalent.
Thus these claims about rock cooking IMO bother some who have cooked their rocks before. The claims being made [and implications that somehow it is `superior'] are self-contradictory and incorrect.
It isn't faster, it isn't cheaper, and is unlikely to be any easier than most curing methods.
I dunno, but I've never found a problem with normal curing methods for new LR.
While I see strong reasons for this method in certain contexts - as a general method for new rock curing I guess I'm totally confused why this has anything on a traditional method.
IMO it's unlikely that any new aquarist would be in a circumstance where rock cooking would be my preferred method for rock preparation. Not impossible, but for 80%+ ... why would they need it?