Seachem Purigen or Carbon (Granular Activated Carbon) - Which is a Better Filter?

Seachem Purigen or Carbon (Granular Activated Carbon) - Which is a Better Filter?


  • Total voters
    13

that Fish Guy

Frag Swap Crusader!

Attachments

  • PA0372MBDPACLg1011jpg83954640x640.ashx.jpg
    PA0372MBDPACLg1011jpg83954640x640.ashx.jpg
    69.8 KB · Views: 2
I use both as they have different purposes. I use the gac in a reactor and throw a bag of purigen in a high flow area of the sump.
 
I've been using Purigen for about 7 years. You can't tell when carbon is exhausted so your always just replacing it. Purigen changes color and can be regenerated which saves money. 250 ml does the trick for 100 gal volume. I believe that's more than recommended, but overall it saves money and is effective. Regular partials and proper feeding my NO3 was 2ppm today.
 
The reason that I posted this Thread was because I read some posts that stated that Carbon caused Corals to Fade in Color (Especially SPS).

And I have a few SPS that do not look like other people's SPS that I know.

So I wanted to stop Carbon and maybe replace it with Purigen.

Has anybody tried this with Success?

Or would Purigen just cause Corals to Fade in Color too?
 
I'm thinkin' that color is more of a light issue. No? Yes, higher nutrient levels can contribute, but I'm not sure about the exchange resin.
 
I know this is an old thread but I was reading up on Purigen and stumbled across it.

My thoughts on SPS and fading -- as fishchef mentioned -- is probably a lighting issue indirectly related to using Purigen or carbon. Nutrient rich water naturally yellows, causing less light to penetrate. When Purigen (assuming it pulls out organics like carbon) or a fresh batch of carbon is added to the system, the yellowing may quickly disappear which will allow more light to the SPS. The coral may have to readjust to the brighter light, causing slight bleaching or fading. Just a guess.
 
Back
Top