Pics look great.
Rob, those values are excellent.
The Solaris produces 17k LUX, compared to T5 at 13k, VHO at 9k, and my LED light stips in the sump at 6k.
The MH produce 33k. This is nearly double the output. However, the flaw of MH is unequal intensity distribution unlike fluorescent lamps and the Solaris. In other words, MH lamps offer high intensity levels directly under the lamps, but as light rays travel at angles deeper into the tank, intensity levels (LUX) are greatly reduced.
So comparing the Solaris to MH for raw intensity is somewhat misleading. It is best to compare the Solaris to lamps that offer a similar light projection. That is, compare them to the linear lamps like VHO and T5. The Solaris offers 4k more LUX compared to the T5s which, by the way has been proven successful in sps only reefs.
The Solaris produces 31% more light output than T5s. Impressive!It seems that there will be gaps of light penetration through the tank due to the spacing in each of the six LED Banks, but this should be minimal compared to the gaps in MH lighting. So as an overall lighting system producing 17K LUX at wide dispersion angles, it is a winner.
Time will tell if they can last 11years, as suggested by manufacturer claims. I feel they will not hold LUX levels at the value of 17K for more than 3 years. So, let's say a 30% loss occurs over three years. Then the LUX levels would be 13k, equal to that of new T5 lamps. Still not bad, since we know that T5s will support a stocked sps tank.
The overall color appearance given off by the Solaris is nice and warm in the photos (purple and pink hues). I prefer this look over the crisp white and blues given off by the MH.
Do you get shimmer effects from the Solaris?