Just thought I'd throw in my 2c. I have a 2 x 65W PC fixture (10k / actinic) over a 24" deep tank. Many people seem to think that this is all wrong for macro growth, yet I have explosive growth (doubling every week or two) of caulerpa racemosa, solid growth of razor caulerpa, erratic growth of an as yet unidentified grape-type caulerpa (swings between explosive and near death in a two week period) and some slow growth of chaeto (although I might attribute this slow growth more to the nutrient export properties of the racemosa than the lighting).
One comment I might make is that I didn't see great growth until I dialed my skimmer back (went away for a week and just wanted it to take care of any disasters). When I got back I couldn't believe how much growth there had been - every macro in the tank appeared to have been held back by nutrients far more than light. Since none of the major indicators (nitrites, nitrates, phosphates) has even registered on a test kit in quite a while, regardless of how I set the skimmer, it is going to get turned off for a few days / weeks / permanently.
Dave
One comment I might make is that I didn't see great growth until I dialed my skimmer back (went away for a week and just wanted it to take care of any disasters). When I got back I couldn't believe how much growth there had been - every macro in the tank appeared to have been held back by nutrients far more than light. Since none of the major indicators (nitrites, nitrates, phosphates) has even registered on a test kit in quite a while, regardless of how I set the skimmer, it is going to get turned off for a few days / weeks / permanently.
Dave