dtum
New member
I found that a slightly higher nitrate brings out those colors...
Thanks, I probably would have to lower my Prodibio dosing, since it is too effective at eliminating them. Or increase my feedings.
I found that a slightly higher nitrate brings out those colors...
Routine form your build thread.
![]()
Looks like you have a lot going on dosing wise and I am not familiar with the products. Are you running Activated Carbon? If so in a reactor or passive? The Carbon dosing may be starving your tank and the look kind of hungry. Keep in mind that the light may be more intense vs your old lights and the corals may be metabolizing much faster where they might come up empty handed nutritionally. Judging on your pictures from May you appear to be getting growth.
You are at 60% light wise which doesn't say much. I would look to maximize the blue channel and minimize the whites to 10-20% from a light standpoint but I think your main problem is coral nutrition.
Edit: One other thing which makes life easier on corals metabolizing is a PH at say 8.3. You are running low alk because of the carbon dosing I get it but you might have better success and maintaining an higher PH at say ALK 8.3 which would effectively bring your ORP down to 400-350.
+1.
Also with zero nitrates your corals could be hungry. Increase the feedings and keep some detectable NO3 (2-3). Worked for me.
Like others have said, great colors seem to come with detectable nitrates and "manageable" phosphates. I neglected my tank a little through the summer and about a month and a half ago started getting it back into shape. When I tested the water I found that nitrates were undetectable and phosphate was .05 on my Hannah Checker. I had a little algae on the rocks but nothing too bad at all. I manually removed what I could, did a 100% sump water change where I vacuumed all detritus from the sump and scraped it clean. While it may seem counterintuitive to feed more when you have a higher than desirable phosphate reading, I've found that if I change the GFO more often (instead of running a higher quantity of media) that my phosphates gradually decline even though I ramp up feeding the fish. After a month or so, I have fatter, happier fish with nitrates around 5ppm and phosphate around .03. Color is returning and polyp extension is good throughout the day and night. I think so many of us get hung up on bringing nitrates down that the imbalance allows phosphates to slowly creep up. When a system is nitrogen starved phosphate cannot be reduced.
Personally, I've seen my best SPS coloration when nitrates bounce between 5 and 10, and phosphates are .03 - .05. You already seem to know what you're doing. Your tank looks great, but for that extra little pop it would help to feed more, remove as much detritus as possible from your sump, sand, liverock and overflows and change your gfo more often instead of adding more at your regular intervals.
HTH
Your tank is amazing. I would do a weekly night time feeding of rotifers (or other foods in the 50-400µm range).
IMO 7.33 for alk is a bit low. Bump it up to 8.5 or 9, you will get faster growth and it will help with your low pH.
If I were in your shoes I would do 3 things, night time feedings, up the kh, and max out the lights (increase over time).
Your tank is amazing. I would do a weekly night time feeding of rotifers (or other foods in the 50-400µm range).
IMO 7.33 for alk is a bit low. Bump it up to 8.5 or 9, you will get faster growth and it will help with your low pH.
If I were in your shoes I would do 3 things, night time feedings, up the kh, and max out the lights (increase over time).
Yes, I am running ROX activated carbon, roughly 100ml in a sock bag, passive.
Interestingly enough, I was running close to 100% on the lights in May, but so many people were saying to dial down that I've finally succumbed. My growth is really great and has always been.
I've recently lowered the white spectrum somewhat (about 3 weeks ago) but did not notice much of a change yet.
The only reason I'm running low alk is because I was mimicking the natural sea water and also the European school, thinking that it would bring out the best colors, but so far that was not the case. What does carbon dosing have to do with low alk? Thanks!
Bingo - Id take the carbon out and watch your colors return. I run carbon passive a day a week. This a new process. I belive it starved out my corals along with the BP's and caused my tank crash. I think it removes important trace elements that in an ULNS is a huge problem for SPS. I have actually taken my carbon offline for about a month now and the tank looks much better IMO.
When you are running an ULNS it is a best practice to emulate natural sea water averages. It has been reported that alk higher than 9 is a big problem for ULNS. I am not sure scientifically why but I know corals grow faster at alk 9 and above so the assumption is that there is not enough nutrients to meet the growth demand.
Yikes! Now what about the yellowing of the water? Also, isn't carbon use widespread (everyone is using it). I'm using just a tiny bit and it is passive.
I will listen to your advice and will take it out, but can you elaborate on this, plus what's the rationale for using it once a week, also what do you do with it afterwards?
Yikes! Now what about the yellowing of the water? Also, isn't carbon use widespread (everyone is using it). I'm using just a tiny bit and it is passive.
I will listen to your advice and will take it out, but can you elaborate on this, plus what's the rationale for using it once a week, also what do you do with it afterwards?
I would look at your lighting. Radions just don't cut it over SPS, IME. I had the same issues in my 465 gallon SPS tank, went back to Radium metal halides, and got my colors back.
I have two Radion Pros over a 100 gallon mixed LPS/Softy reef and they are fantastic. Not so much for SPS, however.
I've done my research on this before getting them and I've seen quite a few breathtaking SPS tanks running Radions, especially the Pros. I doubt it is the lights capabilities.
I would look at your lighting. Radions just don't cut it over SPS, IME. I had the same issues in my 465 gallon SPS tank, went back to Radium metal halides, and got my colors back.
I have two Radion Pros over a 100 gallon mixed LPS/Softy reef and they are fantastic. Not so much for SPS, however.
Most of the time those that are perfectly happy with LEDs over SPS have not used Halides over SPS. Not sure if you or the OP fall into this category. Here's a 40 page thread discussing it as well.
http://www.reefcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2203067
Either way, the lights you or OP chooses is your choice, but lack of color could be your lighting choice lighting as much as anything else already mentioned in this thread.
Any research on Reef Central about LEDs or Radions specifically would have brought up thread after thread about color loss after placing LEDs over an SPS tank.
I used halides on my tank a 400watt radium and 150 watts of actinic. Yes they work well but the heat and the electric bill was out of control. I am getting better growth and more flexibility from LEDs and programming then with MH and actinics.
Doubt I will every go back to old school lighting.
Are your SPS colors as intense as they were under halides? That is what I was commenting on. There are advantages/disadvantages/tradeoffs to both types of lighting. If the electricity/programming advantages of LEDs were as or more important than color to me, I would have stuck with the Radions. But I am willing to pay for the extra electricity and any heat issues for the color intensity that a Radium 400 watt Halide gives SPS. My 465 is in my basement, and a fan blowing over my sump keeps the temp at 80 or less all the time, even with 4x 400 watt Radiums over the tank. Haven't needed a chiller all summer, and I live in Atlanta, pretty warm place.