The info in the MSDS doesn't provide enough information to make that determination?Sorry, we cannot tell if it is adequately pure or not. It may be fine.
The info in the MSDS doesn't provide enough information to make that determination?
The info in the MSDS doesn't provide enough information to make that determination?
Thanks for the reply Randy. Have yet to set up my CA reactor, so I was looking for something suitable and convenient. I'll look for another option until I get the opportunity to work with the reactor. I'm sure that will present it's own issuesAt least back when I did the study (and all I tested is in the study), folks were able to show that Prestone Driveway Heat was sourced by Dow (by the MSDS, I think). Whether that or any other products now are, or whether other suppliers have come, I do not know. Also, Dow is now leaving more bromide in the product. That is probabyl OK, but it shows how products change over time and such changes certainly wouldn't always be be communicated to deicer or pool customers.
You're correct on all counts. I asked a question and got a few meaningful answersI'm curious as to why you'd want to take a chance on the product you mentioned. While there's nothing particularly inexpensive about reef-keeping, it seems to me that purchasing calcium chloride and sodium bicarbonate from a reliable supplier like BRS is extremely cheap. For example, a 5 gallon pail of Calcium Chloride is about $85. Given a density of 1.8 g/cm3 for calcium chloride dihydrate, that works out to be 80 pounds of calcium chloride, or about 25 pounds of Calcium as an ion.
That's a boatload of calcium; if you had a 200 gallon system volume, and your tank consumed calcium at the rate of 20 ppm per day, I calculate that you'd use roughly half of that 5 gallon pail in a year. My guess is that a 200 gallon reef tank would use about that much money in just electricity every couple of months.
Given that BRS and other suppliers do apparently use analyzed bulk pharmaceutical chemicals for their products, I'd personally much rather pay a small pittance in extra $ rather than use a technical-grade product that may or may not be consistently low in contaminants from lot-to-lot.
You're correct on all counts. I asked a question and got a few meaningful answers![]()
Please don't take offense, I wasn't picking on you, just genuinely curious.![]()
At least back when I did the study (and all I tested is in the study), folks were able to show that Prestone Driveway Heat was sourced by Dow (by the MSDS, I think). Whether that or any other products now are, or whether other suppliers have come, I do not know. Also, Dow is now leaving more bromide in the product. That is probabyl OK, but it shows how products change over time and such changes certainly wouldn't always be be communicated to deicer or pool customers.