Sump pics

Lakeside518

Clownfish
Premium Member
Having a 75 gal tank with an AGA stand limits me to a 29 gal sump.

The 1st section will be filter sock & ASM G-3 skimmer with ball valve mod.

In the baffle I'll run 2 bags of Chemi-pure and a micron bag of Kents Reef crabon.

2nd section/Center section will be return pump an Eheim 1260 and a MJ-900 feeding my 6x Turbo twist UV light.

3 rd section far right will be my fuge that will overflow via a screened bulkhead into the return pump section.


100_3367.jpg


100_3367.jpg


100_3369.jpg


100_3370.jpg


100_3371.jpg
 
lookin good. When i upgrade to a 90 im sure ill have tons of questions for you. I will also be using the ASM G3, I thought you could fit a 30 long under a 75/90.
 
You could but you may never get it back out. My plan was for a 30 gal but not possible. I was an inch to an inch and a half short of being able to slide it underneith. :(

My next upgrade which will be a 120 gal RR I'll build a 40 gal breeder sump below with 3 doors. 1 door on left side and the standard 2 doors in the front with no center brace.
 
will you be doing the 120 4 foot or 6 foot, i am on the fence of getting a 120 4 foot instead of the 90, it shouldnt cost much more and shouldnt change my plans too much.
 
i never use uv steralization due to an oppinion ive formed. first people get them cause they are often dealing with parasites. my oppinion : parasites often effect fish when water quality swings often, so instead of using that, look at your habits...feeding...any levels are bad levels(ammonia,trites,and trates, phos,etc).......too many fish for your tank size.......fresh water source......ph swings at night!.....ect. ok uv is great but can effect plankton and does effect good bacteria as well as shifting any chemical compounds that u may use like trace elements or iodine. now i do understand that filtration and skimming does remove lots of this stuff too but when skimmer is set to skim dry/to very little wet, it can allow more time for plankton to be circulated and eaten in the tank. as a true reef tank hobbiest i stay away from unnatural things like this but again it is effective but i think looking at other issues can also be effective too. in fish only they are great!but i believe in natural reef medicines. anyone every hear that a well established reef tank will cure or allow any parasite to pass and not contaminate others? its true for me ....
overall its a great tool but when going natural its always far more effective in long run. thats why i use algea scrubbing like the ocean does.
DSCN0570.jpg


this is the sump and flow must pass through this macro. flow is at about 40 gallons and hour..thats it...as more contact time with algea is imp! macro has been said to have healing properties for fish..and i qoute "Marine plants have become quite popular for use in "algae-scrubbing filters" to remove excess ammonia, nitrates, and phosphates from the aquarium.In addition, it helps remove heavy metals and neutralize's toxins.Marine plants also provide a pH buffer and produce chemicals which protect the skin, intestines, and gills of aquarium fish. That's an alwful lot of help! In addition to helping clarify your water by absorbing nitrates, carbon dioxide and some metals, marine plants also serve as a food source for many marine species â€"œ whether they feed directly on the algae itself or on microfauna attracted to the algae."
qoute from this site
http://www.aquacon.com/vip.html

this is natural! and by far the most effective as the ocean uses this and is very successful. heres a pic of my sump when it was set up (days old)...currently it looks like swamp thing...lol
DSCN1481.jpg

again im just giving other options and do not debunk uv steralizers but state another option for what they do.;)
 
UV sterilization: A UV sterilizer consists of a powerful short - wave lamp placed in such way as to irradiate a stream of water that flows past the lamp, killing anything in it. UV sterilization is expensive, and may actually be ineffective at its claimed purpose of removing pathogens from aquaria and degrading dissolved protein molecules. Even if it does what it says, UV sterilization probably has limited beneficial value to a natural ecosystem tank and may be harmful if it degrades too much natural bacterial flora. My advice - don't bother.

The only caveat to this suggestion is: keep an eye on the literature. I suppose it is conceivable that new research will reveal some sort of indispensible function that UV from the sun performs in nature, but I doubt it.

qoute from this site http://www.angelfire.com/ri/skibizniz/aquarium.html
 
two weeks ago i added a new fish...it got ich and eventually pop eye! swear to god........hes now fine and dandy. i did nothing but let nature heal it. non of my old fish got it. honest info from me....again this hobby is generated by oppinions and this is mine.
 
uv is used at the lfs i work at and i swear to u...the fish still get ich from time to time.
 
again guys i dont debunk uv steralizers as they must have benefits or it would never make it in the hobby for this long. i just have an oppinion as do others on its use. the one at the lfs i work at must work cause only new inhabitants show ich sometimes and no other fish get it once it passes. I guess this would support the idea that once the parasite drops off the fish it is in the water column and thus removed via uv steralization.:D :D
 
Back
Top