not out of experience but from reading on each bulbs specs i believe that:
ATI Blue+ (actinic)
KZ Fiji-purple
ATI Blue+ (actinic)
ATI Aquablue Special (12000 K)
will look white on blue side with some pink ( making i kinda purple), this may be my next order
and
ATI Blue+ (actinic)
ATI Aquablue Special (12000 K)
KZ Fiji-purple
ATI Aquablue Special (12000 K)
will look more pink and less blue than above
I would stay away from 6500k trust me, its yellow and nothing like tropical sunlight. it may look more like sunlight we get here

sunlight in Caribbean is blinding crisp white here is soft yellow. 6500k will make everything look washed out. Also yellow tones don't travel well through water and that's why bluer wavelengths is what corals generally see in nature.
What kind of corals are you planning on keeping? if they are on blue/green side i'd go with bluer spectrum, the light would not literally look blue in your tank but will promote blue algae in per say acros color up better. if you have more orange/red/pink then fiji purple will do the same for them.
one more thing, if you read in the thread above, ATI and UVL outperformed Geissman brand bulbs coral growth and par rating a while back. I am not sure if they have improved since.
Edit - P.S. i think you may be worried that by so many names with "blue" your light would actually look blue. It does not, it promotes blue and actinics on their own ( morning / night ) are blue but in combination it makes a crisp white tropical sunlight look ( minus the shimmer) and doesn't actually look blue to your eyes.
what is the difference in the way it looks compared to
ATI Blue+ (actinic)
KZ Fiji-purple
ATI Blue+ (actinic)
ATI Aquablue Special (12000 K)
or
ATI Blue+ (actinic)
ATI Aquablue Special (12000 K)
KZ Fiji-purple
ATI Aquablue Special (12000 K)
(btw...bulb 1 and 3 would be together and same for 2 and 4) (also i was thinking about using a GE 6500K instead of one of the 12000k so it looks more like sunlight)