brad
Active member
I disagree with the premise that a longer thinner tank is better than a wider tank of equal volume. I have a 4'x4' with fish that I know would never have worked in my 120. I hate seeing long, thin tanks with active fish that can barely turn around. Completely unscientific, but would you want to spend your life pacing back and forth in a line?
Don't look at the size of the fish, but the activity level. I had yellows in my 120, a hepetus for years, a mimic, or purple would probably be fine. A powder blue or Achilles is not much bigger of a fish than some you can get away with, but IMO needs a bigger tank than a sailfin.
I am also going to go against the majority and say it is fine to get a tiny tang and hope it doesn't outgrow your tank, as long as you are willing to give it up if it does. I have 3 yellows right now that are about 3 inches. They don't seem unhappy in any way, look perfectly healthy, but never got bigger. People advise you not to take a grouper or shark, as you won't be able to rehome it when it gets too big, but I doubt you'll have trouble finding a home for a tang.
Don't look at the size of the fish, but the activity level. I had yellows in my 120, a hepetus for years, a mimic, or purple would probably be fine. A powder blue or Achilles is not much bigger of a fish than some you can get away with, but IMO needs a bigger tank than a sailfin.
I am also going to go against the majority and say it is fine to get a tiny tang and hope it doesn't outgrow your tank, as long as you are willing to give it up if it does. I have 3 yellows right now that are about 3 inches. They don't seem unhappy in any way, look perfectly healthy, but never got bigger. People advise you not to take a grouper or shark, as you won't be able to rehome it when it gets too big, but I doubt you'll have trouble finding a home for a tang.
Last edited: