THE GREAT SKIMMERLESS DEBATE! join on in

You also have to remember that a lot of the sps in the hobby, such as many montis, actually come from more lagoonal type environments, and not the reef crest as often assumed. So, many of them are adapted to or actually prefer more turbid conditions.
 
Although Mr. Eric Borneman is not weell recieved on this forum anymore, i thought I would share some quotes from his book 'Aquarium Corals' that I thought were appropriate for this discussion.

PG.325

"Algal Turf Scrubbing uses a brighlty illuminated campartment where algal turfs can be segregated and cultured apart from the display aquarium. These turfs are very efficient consumers of the phosphorus and nitrate that reduce water quality and prevent succesful growth of corals"

pg 325-326

"I think it is most improtant to recognize that the great advances in keeping reef organisms have come from better use of natural processess rather than new inventions"
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=7534517#post7534517 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Jeremy Blaze
Although Mr. Eric Borneman is not weell recieved on this forum anymore, i thought I would share some quotes from his book 'Aquarium Corals' that I thought were appropriate for this discussion.


pg 325-326

"I think it is most improtant to recognize that the great advances in keeping reef organisms have come from better use of natural processess rather than new inventions"

But skimming is a Natural Process.

Go to any beach and you will see it in action.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=7534565#post7534565 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Jeremy Blaze
But who removes the skimmate from the beach, wouldn't most of it wash back into the sea?

That is a good question.

Maybe it dry out into the sand or evaporates?
 
Well if it dries out in the sand, wouldn't it just wash back into the water from run off or high tides?
If it evaoporates, I would think most of the 'stuff' would stay behind. If the 'stuff' evaporated, then we would not have a build up of nutrients in our tanks due to the high amount of evaporation most of us have in our tanks.
 
Good point.

Maybe its there is bacteria on the beach that is breaking it down?

I think we should try and contact an expert about this.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=7534810#post7534810 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by SunnyX
Good point.

Maybe its there is bacteria on the beach that is breaking it down?


Like a DSB?:D
 
I am not an expert, but this is where a lot of these dynamics get rather complicated. There are various animals that feed on these organic films--various crustaceans especially (mainly Ocypodids). Bacteria etc. also take advantage of this as well. Insects along the beach may utilize the opportunity. There are others that I know I am leaving out, just can't recall ATM.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=7534825#post7534825 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Jeremy Blaze
Like a DSB?:D

Shhhh......You might wake the fanatic BB worshipers.
notworthy.gif
 
I hate my skimmer and the one before it, I am going to be turning it off soon. I just have to get my refug back on and running. My skimmer has to be cleaned every few days and I am not talking the collection cup, I am talking the complete skimmer, it is huge and a pain in the butt. This is the second one that I have had that has been that way and both were made by two different companies. My tank started skimmerless and then after 4 years I added a skimmer because everyone says you need one. Since then I have had nothing but problems, I got algae coming and going, never had that when I was skimmerless. Coral are growing and colored the same.

I know when I hit the ocean for vacation parts of it did look like a skimmer running but it always went right back into the ocean. I would love to hear and expert on this subject to see what is really going on
 
The great DISTURBANCE!

The great DISTURBANCE!

Hello again, I see this is already a hit!

Let me first start and comment on a few of everyones comments.


Shawnts106, I dont understand your take on refugiums
I love Refugiums... I had one myself, I loved it because I could grow fresh macro for my wonderful tangs that I love so much and grow fresh coral food for the ... corals I love so much ...Plus it provides a service, which is nutrient removeal.. while a fuge might not be as efficient as say.. a Deltec whatever but it does do a job none-the-less.

To be honest I dont understand why people waste their money on DT's and such. Why make your tank dirtier than it has to be?
I will let you in on something, DT's works.. and if you have a skimmer to pull whats left over out, then good...
I used to not use DTS and then one day found it and started useing it and WALAA!... I noticed a HUGE difference, better coral health, better PE better pod population.. healthier looking everything!... The stuff works, plus, if you plan on ever keeping Gonipora and Alveopora species... youve got to have the stuff IMO...

Guys you really have to see this advancedaquarists tank feature. Its an 80gallon run with out a skimmer using a plenum. He calls it the "Jaubert System". He also only uses 4 x 54 watt T5's on his 80gallon tank with SPS simply everywhere. This alone is amazing.
Thats what IM TALKING ABOUT!

I have strong suspicions that most people's tanks would run at their peak potentials WITH a skimmer.
Possibly, depending on the corals they wish to keep, like I stated earlier, Goniopora and Alveopora species like "dirty water" but if your growing acros out the wa-zoo then it might be a good idea to, depending on which side of the fence your leaning on.

Jeremy Blaze
Thank you for posting that about your tank, that was much help too all, I wish that more Skimmerless people would post like that, showing what they do and when they do it.

I still do not understand why anyone would WANT to run a tank without a skimmer
well, thats why I created this thread. Thats what we are doing, learning from each other.

Yes you can have success without a skimmer, but I know for a FACT that if you added a skimmer on to these skimmerless systems they would improve in appearance.
So your telling me that those marvelous tanks would look better??? hum, bold statement!

What happens if you need to treat for red bug? You need the skimmer to pull the medication out of the tank.
What happens when your clams decided to spawn
Why not use a technology that CAN and WILL make your job much easier while making your tank cleaner, clearer and more enjoyable to look at?
Well some people acctually have water on hand for these, rare happenings. but yes, a skimmer would aid in these rare situations.

But who removes the skimmate from the beach, wouldn't most of it wash back into the sea?
Yes it does, Normally the nutrient content near the shore is higher than a reef due to that exactly... thats why algae blooms happen near the shore and not in the middle of the pacific... NOW in the event that happened, we would all need to suddenly get on our hands and knees, reach for the sky and start screaming like all get out... or... you could just go on liveing your daily life... whatever suits you.

Like a DSB? ; Shhhh......You might wake the fanatic BB worshipers

LOL, OH GOSH, lets NOT GET ON DSB VS BB!... not the place for that, and I HAVE STRONG VIEWS ON THAT SUBJECT!... trust me, not a friendly place to go....

My skimmer has to be cleaned every few days and I am not talking the collection cup, I am talking the complete skimmer, it is huge and a pain in the butt.

LMBO, you own a SEACLONE DON'T YOU!!! HAHAHAHA!!!!!!!! lol!
sorry just had too!




OK, now that thats over... Lets look at some other possibilitys... like DUEL METHODS, HYBRIDIZING METHODS...

What about... setting up a system that runs a refugium and a skimmer. Lets say you have a 100 gallon aquarium and you have a fuge but need a skimmer, so get a skimmer rated up to 100gallons, meaning its acctually rated from 50 to 75gallons... that way, your not overskimmer, but slightly underskimming and utilizing the eco-method so youv'e got the best of both worlds?

Kinda like those ugly BB systems with a big ol' 5 gallon bucket filled with sand that is suppose to be a denitrofier.

This would aid in alot, aid in pod population, and help make your life easier if say, you did have a red bug problem or flatworm problem or your clams spawned....
etc.. lets hear more good things about this hybrid system....
 
and BTW...

When I did have my fuge, I didnt run a skimmer, and had great success...


My fuge broke, so I stuck a skimmer on it, a seaclone 100... didnt do a thing... just took it out after a few weeks...

so no skimmer, and not doing wc's regularly... and no problems.. Then I go and get an ASMG2 and put on there, and it works NO problem... but now, my euphyllias are mad and dieing... everything else is fine, but my euphyllias...

I have not notice any difference in growth ... or much difference in color... if ANYTHING I would say the addition to the skimmer on my system upset things and as a result I have having a problem because of the skimmer... so this is just my 2 cents....
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=7534637#post7534637 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by SunnyX
That is a good question.

Maybe it dry out into the sand or evaporates?

And what happens when it rains.....


Also, the amount of foam that collects on the beach is miniscule compared to the billions of fish peeing and pooping in the ocean. It may be a natural process, but it is not an important one.

Dan
 
I think a couple distinctions need to be made. First off from what I've read on various forums most skimmerless systems have been on the smaller side. I see very few 200G+ systems without a skimmer.

Second I think we need to distinguish what the aquarist is trying to keep. I've seen very nice plenum systems that catered to softies. Not so many with SPS.

WRT to the 80G system shown earlier in the thread I think we all would love to see the details...like is ozone used, phosban, WC schedule, dosing regimen, how long has it been up. We need to see how the long term success is with the skimmerless method for the type of corals you want to keep. I see many examples in a low nutrient BB SPS system where LPS or softies do ok at first then slowly decline.

What I would love to see is large tank skimmerless sytems with crystal clear water, insane colors and good growth. SPS dominated. That's the holy grail and this IS the SPS forum after all.:D
 
Phil, I don't know what you consider large, but go look ayt Mike Paletta's book Ultimate Marine Aquariums,

Pg. 62 Turf Scrubber Reef, it was a 180 gallonreef with good sps growth. I saw this tank in preson on a weekly basis, and it had awsome growth. The only reason he no longer runs the scrubber is because he was no longer allowed to sell them.

pg.69 Algae filtered System Nice 120 gallon set up

pg.100 Mud & Acropora 180 gallon tank with lots of acros

pg 176 Pair of Reefs, 240 galloon sps tank

Again, I have said it over and over, Inland Aquatics, some of the biggest tanks I have seen, in which they GROW corals, including a lot of nice acroporas, all with algae filtered tanks.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=7537635#post7537635 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Philwd

Second I think we need to distinguish what the aquarist is trying to keep. I've seen very nice plenum systems that catered to softies. Not so many with SPS.

WRT to the 80G system shown earlier in the thread I think we all would love to see the details...like is ozone used, phosban, WC schedule, dosing regimen, how long has it been up. We need to see how the long term success is with the skimmerless method for the type of corals you want to keep. I see many examples in a low nutrient BB SPS system where LPS or softies do ok at first then slowly decline.


Go back to my post....there is a link to his aquarium of the month with all the details. As for age I think he set it up in 2003.
 
Back
Top