crashrat
New member
The more I read this log thread the more confused I get. A couple of questions I have, 1. Is actinic really needed, or is it just for aesthetics, could one just replace with a Blue+ to get more PAR? I understand the goal is to get a good spectrum and PAR, but would one compromise spectrum for PAR, and what about usable spectrum. What part of the spectrum is used most by SPS, LPS or softies. This may seem like a huge question but it's been on my mind for a while. The second question is a request for a t5 prescription from Grim, I have a 6 bilb tek with SPS/LPS and clams. I currently have
ATI
Blue+
Aqua Blue
Actinic
Pro Color
Aqua Blue
Blue +
It's about time to get new bulbs so what's would work good for me? I was thinking of getting the ATI Super Actinic and replace the pro Color with another Blue +. Is this too much Blue, should I go with a Aquasun instead?
Thanks
ATI
Blue+
Aqua Blue
Actinic
Pro Color
Aqua Blue
Blue +
It's about time to get new bulbs so what's would work good for me? I was thinking of getting the ATI Super Actinic and replace the pro Color with another Blue +. Is this too much Blue, should I go with a Aquasun instead?
Thanks