I’m in the process of an upgrade and building the wood tank below. The tank will be SPS dominant and barebottom. I wanted to ask for advice on organizing my Tunze throughout the tank.
As you can see from the drawing, I’m planning on having 2 external waveboxes on the one end (I’ve never done these before, so if there is any problem with their arrangement or any suggestions to make them more efficient, please let me know). I will also have a closed loop along the back with a Reeflow Barracuda connected to an OM 4-way. I intend to have the outputs pointing downward to create a circular flow from back to front in order to keep the bottom clean of detritus.
I currently have 7 x 6100’s, and 2x6200’s and considering buying 2x6300’s and need to figure out the best way to place them. I have a Profilux controller that I want to use to control all the Tunze pumps.
My current plan is to put a 6100 in each corner on a DIY Wavysea type device to rotate them 90 degrees. If I were to buy the 6300’s, I thought that I would put those in the front corners (point across to the opposing back corner) and put a 6200 in each back corner pointing to the opposing front corner in order to get a good push (turbulence) going diagonally across the tank. I’d. How does this plan sound so far?
So, that would leave me with 3 more 6100’s. What should I do with those or is what I have suggested so far enough? I personally don’t think you can have too much flow (e.g., I have 2x6200, 6x6100, and closed loop Amp Master 3000 on my current 150 gallon, and the tank is doing great!).
I don’t want to see a bunch of the Tunze pumps across the back (as I currently do in the 150G). In the original plan, I will already have two Tunze visible in each back corner. The front corner isn’t going to be an issue since the viewing area is just over 6†in from the sides, which should hide the front pumps quite well. Maybe I could hold off on the others until my corals grow enough to hide them across the back [if there is agreement that the 2x6300’s, 2x6200’s, 4x6100’s (on swivels), Barracuda on CL, and 2 x waveboxes is sufficient flow]. Upon reading it again, it sure sounds like a lot!
Thanks for your help!
Cheers,
Steve
As you can see from the drawing, I’m planning on having 2 external waveboxes on the one end (I’ve never done these before, so if there is any problem with their arrangement or any suggestions to make them more efficient, please let me know). I will also have a closed loop along the back with a Reeflow Barracuda connected to an OM 4-way. I intend to have the outputs pointing downward to create a circular flow from back to front in order to keep the bottom clean of detritus.
I currently have 7 x 6100’s, and 2x6200’s and considering buying 2x6300’s and need to figure out the best way to place them. I have a Profilux controller that I want to use to control all the Tunze pumps.
My current plan is to put a 6100 in each corner on a DIY Wavysea type device to rotate them 90 degrees. If I were to buy the 6300’s, I thought that I would put those in the front corners (point across to the opposing back corner) and put a 6200 in each back corner pointing to the opposing front corner in order to get a good push (turbulence) going diagonally across the tank. I’d. How does this plan sound so far?
So, that would leave me with 3 more 6100’s. What should I do with those or is what I have suggested so far enough? I personally don’t think you can have too much flow (e.g., I have 2x6200, 6x6100, and closed loop Amp Master 3000 on my current 150 gallon, and the tank is doing great!).
I don’t want to see a bunch of the Tunze pumps across the back (as I currently do in the 150G). In the original plan, I will already have two Tunze visible in each back corner. The front corner isn’t going to be an issue since the viewing area is just over 6†in from the sides, which should hide the front pumps quite well. Maybe I could hold off on the others until my corals grow enough to hide them across the back [if there is agreement that the 2x6300’s, 2x6200’s, 4x6100’s (on swivels), Barracuda on CL, and 2 x waveboxes is sufficient flow]. Upon reading it again, it sure sounds like a lot!
Thanks for your help!
Cheers,
Steve