And the check valve will fail. Do not rely on it to save you from a flood.
You don't need unions.
In my opinion ,most basic systems don't" need them", more elaborate systems,yes.
I only use them on the return pump for cleaning
Getting equipment together to work on my plumbing. I'd like to plan water levels in my 75 gal, 30 gal sump so that if I have a failure, it won't overflow. I was going to put in a check valve as a secondary precaution ( first line of defense being correct water levels). Does anyone have any suggestions how I can go about texting my water levels, then adding the check valve later ( other than the obvious setting it all up without the check valve, then breaking it back down to add it)?Great point!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Getting equipment together to work on my plumbing. I'd like to plan water levels in my 75 gal, 30 gal sump so that if I have a failure, it won't overflow. I was going to put in a check valve as a secondary precaution ( first line of defense being correct water levels). Does anyone have any suggestions how I can go about texting my water levels, then adding the check valve later ( other than the obvious setting it all up without the check valve, then breaking it back down to add it)?
Tks
Cindy
Sent from my MotoG3 using Tapatalk
Is there any harm in doing both?You will be way better off just making it so that there is no need for a check valve in the first place. It really is not a question of "if" it might fail, but rather "when" it will fail. If your sump cannot handle whatever water drains down to it when the power is off, the sump is too small and/or the return line is too far from the surface. Ideally, the return line should only be an inch or so below the surface so that as water drains from the DT, a natural, and automatic, siphon break occurs.