Although I do know lots of people use ball valves to adjust flow, they do work, it was not their intended use.
Actually, for industrial use, ball valves are frequently used to modulate flow for small diameter lines (say 6 in. or less), while butterfly valves are used to modulate flow for large diameter lines (8 in. or greater). Ball valves and butterfly valves have the optimal tradeoff between modulation capacity and cost.
Both ball valves and butterfly valves have a very linear relationship between a coefficient called Cv, which translates roughly to head loss across the valve, and degree of modulation (percent open). Moreover, they are relatively less expensive when compared to eccentric plug valves, gate valves, etc.
I was unable to find comparative graphs to demonstrate this, but you can click here to read more about what they refer to as
linear output. You can never get linear output near the valve position extremes, but the more linear your Cv curve is, the greater the ability of your valve to modulate flow.
But somehow all this doesn't translate to reef tanks, where the practices of the field are turned on their head. Here, ball valves are used for on/off applications while the gate valve is used for modulationg flow. Oh well. What can a (former) engineer do?
Matt