wavemaker????

thorsen

New member
I am in the process of designing and aquiring the parts for a new aquarium. I would like to inncorporate a tunze wavemaker but I have some questions.
1. How much lower do you need to run the water level in your aquarium?
2. Does the stress of the water movement stress your tank over time?
Beyond that I was wondering why I don't see more threads with tanks using a tunze wavemaker. Are they in favor or out of favor and for what reasons? Are there other wavemaking devices that are people prefer?
 
I'm assuming that you are referring to the Tunze Wavebox, which produces actual wave-like motion in the tank.
1. That is adjustable and would depend upon how high a wave you want. It is also somewhat dependent upon how long your tank is. The longer the tank, the higher the waves. I would personally go with the water line at least 3-4" below the top just to avoid any possible spillage. Of course, you can get a feel for this once you have it.
2. The constant back and forth motion of the tank water will put extra stress on the tank and stand. I don't think this would be a real issue in a well-made tank or stand. Personally, if I had a big tank I would be very paranoid about such issues. However, when I do get a big tank I'm definitely going to spend the money for a good one. For some of the cheaper types (like AGA for instance), it might be something to consider.

The reason why you might not see more tanks using a Wavebox is probably for the following reasons:
-It costs $500
-It provides a cool effect, but one might wonder if it actually provides much of a beneficial effect.
-It really only works with longer tanks. Some might even doubt if it is worth it on a 4' tank.
-It isn't exactly small or pretty. Unless there is a good place to hide it, it would stick out like a sore thumb in most tanks.
-And finally, it costs $500. I know I already listed that one, but I think most of us are constantly saving our money towards something on our wish list that we feel would improve our tanks greatly. If I had an extra $500 lying around to spend on my tank, I would probably buy a better skimmer, or an ACIII, or perhaps some really nice livestock. Point is that not so many people find it worth spending all that money.

On the question of alternatives, aside from some DIY attempts (somewhat successful, but not quite as good as the real thing) there has not really been an alternative to the Wavebox until recently. Now there are two other things that can perform similar feats. One is the new Aquasurf expansion for the ACJr and ACIII. It allows control over variable speed Tunzes at a fast enough rate to create pressure waves and thereby recreate the effects of a Wavebox. The other is the new wireless controller for the Vortech, which can basically do the same thing. Now that these options are available, I personally think that the Wavebox is sorta obsolete. These controllers eliminate the need for a big ugly box and also allow for many more possibilities in terms of circulation and wavemaking.
 
How much are they again?:D

I would like to have one myself, but I just can't bring myself around to pay that kinda dough for something that appears to be a plastic box, pump and a timer but hey.............nobody said this was a cheap hobby. TinMan
 
I don't see how a wavemaker would really help in an aquarium, at least not in one that could fit in our house, it doesn't seem like it would be natural unless you have a very deep tank that most people would not have in their house. Don't most reef fish usually stay down deeper in the water where they don't really come into contact with waves?
 
It creates flow that occilates back and forth, which is very natural around an ocean reef and is created by wave action.

Though the deeper you go the more it is reduced, that is true.

In an aquarium it also has the benefit of reducing the formation of constantflow that collect detrius in specific areas, and instead the back and forth occilation keeps detrius suspended in the water much more efficiently.
 
Thanks for the information. I wavemaker seems like something that would be really good for a tank, but isn't it a major drawback to have to run your water 3-4 inches lower? If your tank is 24 inches tall and you waterline is at 20 inches your tank is going to look only partially full.
 
I produce about a 1" crest to trough wave so I don't see a need to lower the water level that far. I have canopy on my tank and the trough does not drop below the level of the canopy.
 
Is the 1" trough a level you set? If whatever device you are using is adjustable maybe 1" is not using your device to its full extent? I have a reef keeping books and it mentions the 3 to 4 inch level as well, although I think the book was published about the time the tunze wavemaker was coming out so I'm not sure how accurate the information is.
 
You can adjust the power to the wavebox in additon to the frequency to adjust the height of the wave on the sides of your tank. Maybe it could produce a 4" wave, but I haven't been able to do it. That would be big, especially for my 48" tank.
 
Back
Top