Despite what you have read here. If you are on a budget, a hydrometer is perfectly acceptable tool. They get a bad rap here from people who are too critical and who like to spend money on techno-toys.
First thing is that absolute salinity level isn't that critical and maintaining a stable level is only slightly more important.
Second, a refractometer is more accurate, but in no way is it more reliable! I have both and here is what I did. I took my refractometer and calibrated it (yes, they need to be calibrated every so often, I did mine every 6 months). Then I tested my aquarium water and it was 1.025, OK. Then I took my hydrometer and tested the same water and it was 1.026. Well, that difference is next to nothing. But I put a label on my hydrometer that says "reads 0.001 HIGH". So for 3 years now I have calibrated my refractometer every 6 months and it is always a little off, so I adjust it. Then I test my water and then do the same test with the hydrometer. And EVERY time the hydrometer reads 0.001 higher than the refractometer.
Moral of the story... yes a CALIBRATED refractometer is more accurate than a hydrometer. But it is NOT more reliable. I never have to do anything to the hydrometer but rinse it and shake it dry after I use it. No calibrating, no BS, just subtract 0.001 from the reading and I'm good.
I've done this for a couple of friends as well. Their hydrometers have their own "error" rate, but every time we test them, the error is always the same.
So buy a hydrometer, or get one free from a friend in the hobby. Then find somebody (or an LFS) with a good CALIBRATED refractometer and compare it's readings with your hydrometer and put a label on it to remind you of the error rate.