No IS, but yes you could place it right against the glass if you wanted to, that's why I bought it, the internal focus. There are some photos I took with it a couple of threads down if you want to check them out. I haven't used any of the other lenses though so I can't weigh in on them.
I frequently place the lens directly against the glass. I won't buy a lens that either extends or the front element rotates while focusing, too much of a hassle especially when filters are used. There are a few cheaper options with the Tamron and Sigma. I wouldn't get the Tamron if the front rotates and/or extends. The Sigma takes 77mm filters which can get expensive when compared to the 58mm for Canon. The Sigma also doesn't have the HSM (hyper-sonic motor) when focusing where as the Canon's USM is silent and quick. The Canon just had everything I was looking for.
Ditto the Canon. It's my favorite lens for aquarium shots. In fact, that's almost ALL I use it for. I've got a Canon 28-135 for walking around and a Sigma 100-300 for more specialized stuff and outdoor photography.
I also have the Canon 100mm lense and love it. I tried the other lense that telescopes, and did not like it. I some pics posted in this section with the Canon 100mm macro f/2 lense. Keep in mind I am still learning the camera and lense when you see them
I have the Canon EF-S 60mm f/2.8 macro. It was a bit cheaper than the 100mm, and with the smaller sensor size, still gives 1:1 I think. I'm not 100% sure that I wouldn't have preferred the 100mm though, just to get a bit more magnification.
Ultimately, both the 60mm and the 100mm will give you 1:1 magnification. The 60mm can do 1:1 magnification with the subject about 4" away, while the 100mm can be about 6" away. For macro photography in the aquarium, I find the extra distance to be helpful, since subjects are rarely right up against the glass.
The other major difference is that the 60mm is EF-S mount, which means it's not compatible with all Canon bodies, so you may not be able to use it if you ever move to a non-crop body in the future.
The 60mm is a bit cheaper (I am not too concerned about the EF-S mount issue, but of course if my next body has a larger sensor I reserve the right to change my mind ) but had I thought about the difference in those terms (distance from subject needed to achieve 1:1) I probably would have gone with the 100mm.
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=9147278#post9147278 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by jeffbrig Hey bureau, I wonder if anyone reading this thread would guess we're actually good friends?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.