Who wants to breed Tuna?

It would be really cool to see, but as a commercial operation for fish meat it would be a horrible idea. When it comes to fish, if it isn't wild caught, don't eat it. Farmed fish are an environmental disaster and they aren't worth eating.
 
It would be really cool to see, but as a commercial operation for fish meat it would be a horrible idea. When it comes to fish, if it isn't wild caught, don't eat it. Farmed fish are an environmental disaster and they aren't worth eating.

I have to agree with this. On top of being an environmental disaster, the farm raised species also tend to have higher levels of toxins(biomagnification with added levels in a controlled area.) Ive seen pictures of areas down stream(so to speak) of shrimp farms where the wildlife dies off from all the excess nutrients.
 
Soy and polychaetes are bring used in a big way now for AC feeds. Soy more so and for longer. Companies like Dragon Feeds and Aqua Thrive are pushing the polychaete feeds w/ sustainable fish meal (fish meal scraps from processing plants doing food meant for human consumption)

Yeah scraps used to produce fishmeal are an imporatant resource. By-Catch resources are extremely under utilized and are one of many approaches toward making aquaculture more "green."

From Aquaculture Magazine Jan-Feb 2008 by Ronald W. Hardy:

"Landings of fish to produce fish meal and oil ranged between 28 mmt (million metric tons) and 32 mmt over the past 20 years. Currently about 50% of the annual production of fish meal and 85% or more of fish oil are used to produce aquafeeds. The rest is used in feeds for poultry, swine, cattle, pet foods"

He goes on to add:

"New (1996) estimates that seafood processing wastes and by-catch amounted to the almost 90% of the landed weight of fish harvested to produce fish meal. Globally, processing by-products and by-catch together are estimated to be 25-30 mmt, more or less equivalent to the average volume of landings used to produce fish meal and oil. Thus, if all fisheries by-product and by-catch were used to produce fish meal and oil, annual global production of each would double."

"In 2002, an estimated 5.6 mmt of processing by-products from food fish, were converted into fish meal and oil. This means that only 20% or so of all available by-product material was recovered and utilized."

He goes on to explain gastro-intestinal problems associated with fish meals produced wholly from bone source by-product.

None-the-less there are alot of valuable resources out there that we are missing out on. Not to mention soy proteins that can be added to this by-catch fish meal to create a wholesome feed for aquacultured fish.

Fish farming......especially tuna in sea-pens.....and the term "green" just don't go together.

With all this in mind I respectfully disagree.

Look up the environmental controversy surrounding shrimp culture and salmon culture.....watch out!!!!

There are real problems facing salmon culture, this is primarily a problem of parasitism, viral infections and use and overuse of antibiotics. However if mandated these problems can be mitigated with new technologies.

It would be really cool to see, but as a commercial operation for fish meat it would be a horrible idea. When it comes to fish, if it isn't wild caught, don't eat it. Farmed fish are an environmental disaster and they aren't worth eating.

While this is a horrible reality of poorly managed aquaculture projects (especially in developing countries), I think your over looking the problematic environmental and social issues associated with COMMERCIAL FISHING. Huge corporate fleets utilize; helicopters, planes, sonar, and giant trawlers to decimate wild populations. The truth is that wild fisheries stocks are poorly managed and many if not most are being fished to extinction. This is primarily because of inadequate enforcement of laws on quotas and techniques, the same could be true of farmed stocks if the infrastructure is not developed properly to oversee and mitigate the problems associated with the industry. But your statement vastly ignores the equally major concerns associated with wild populations.

I have to agree with this. On top of being an environmental disaster, the farm raised species also tend to have higher levels of toxins(biomagnification with added levels in a controlled area.) Ive seen pictures of areas down stream(so to speak) of shrimp farms where the wildlife dies off from all the excess nutrients.

Open ocean aquaculture is opening a lot of new opportunities for the industry. Companies like Kona Blue are prime examples of how excess nutrients in open ocean fishery pens can mitigate the large amount of wastes produced by farmed populations, and how aquaculture can be done in a "green" and sustainable manner. Biomagnification is primarily a concern with POP's (persistent organic pollutants) (aldrin, chlordane, DDT, dieldrin, endrin, heptachlor, hexachlorobenzene, mirex, polychlorinated biphenyls, polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins, polychlorinated dibenzofurans, and toxaphene.), antibiotics, and heavy metals.

Aquaculture is probably the only way that we will be able to feed the world in the future.

-Andy Long
 
Last edited:
Might I also add that commercial fishing fleets buy up fishing licenses/permits in countries all over the world, sometimes this involves making some types of commitments to the governing country (which are many times corrupt, especially in Africa). In addition to the fishing pressure they exert on natural stocks in the area, this is a tremendous social injustice.
 
why would somebody ever leave working at Kona Blue?! lol That's my dream job. Except to own my own similar aquaculture outfit.
 
on top of what reeftech posted...

their has been research involving the use of tilapia (which have a surprisingly wide ranging palate) as fish meal. they would plan on farming them with algae, and organic scraps from local buissinesses, soy, etc. so now fish can be reared without a diet of fish, and then used to feed carnivorous fish. fish like..I dont know...tuna?

I think i am being unclear. to clear it up the tilapia would be fed non animal organics, then fed to carnivorous fish.
 
"There are real problems facing salmon culture, this is primarily a problem of parasitism, viral infections and use and overuse of antibiotics. However if mandated these problems can be mitigated with new technologies".


I agree that the aforementioned problems of viral and parasitic issues are a concern and can serve as a source of disease in wild populations. However, the "green" concern is the large amount of biological waste in form of food and feces as well as the effects these biproducts of aquaculture have on the environment local to the areas of culture.

With regard to infectious disease, most wild populations are not enduring the distress that 'life-on-the-fish-farm' hold therefore they are a less likely to suffer from the disease that are seen in adjacent fish culture facilities.

I agree that the key to our future protein consumption is with herbivore type fish and not apex predators like tuna and salmon.
 
Wow. Its easy to become a villain in here. I never said that commercial fishing was better than the fish farms. If you want to see what commercial fishing has done, just go read up on atlantic cod. I know that most fishing is done in a more responsible way, but I guess if your that worried, just make sure you know how it was caught. I don't know if everyone else has this option, but where I live I can actually go out and catch a fish if i really want to eat one. It tastes great, and did no damage to anything in the process of catching it (well the local beer population might get depleted).
 
Back
Top