I disagree guys. You're all acting like this were you or I who owned and needed to sell this house to a guy like, well, you or I. That's not happening. I do a lot of work for builders and owners of homes in the Hamptons - this looks like a house for that kind of buyer, knowing SF areal estate market, so the work involved with this tank won't even register because they won't be doing it. Don't take out the tank, not yet. I would get/find out the monthly maintenance cost using local service. I would also have your guy get an estimate from a contractor for yanking the thing out. When a prospective buyer asks you say "œno work involved, $x to maintain/mos., though seller is willing to remove it if buyer doesn't want it." Most buyers in this range won't blink, and I think most dudes like the idea, if not the reality, of a home aquarium. I also think if they have kids . . .
Don't get me wrong, I don't think you'll get anyone to pay value - or anything close to value - for it (I.e. he's not getting his money out) but if he wants to avoid hassle or removing it I think you leave it in and take a shot. This is like a swimming pool, or a wet bar - a must for some, and PITA for others. I was in the latter category a few years ago - I looked at houses w pools but didn't put added value on a property that had one; other people would jump at it. I think that's your situation.
Plus if I were showing a house, I like the "œowner planned to stay long term and dumped $$$ into house" line, tells a buyer that seller wasn't skimping on anything. Telling them what he paid to make custom reef tank is a big illustration of that.
Plus don't you have all those Tech nerds with money in SF? That's all the reefkeepers on this website are!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk