from waaay back:
250 watt 6500 K. They produce almost as much light as the 400 and are cheeper to operate. The 65K's are the closest to natural sun light and they last up to 2 yrs woth less than 10% reduction in
feel free to correct all the wrong assumptions in my statement: my 75g tank (w 55g sump) that will be primarily 4 nems, 3 e quadricolor and 1 s. helianthus, zoos, various euphylia, and one day a clam or two, will be very well served with 2x250w 6500 mh bulbs. in order to mitigate the horrible walmart yellow pall (my daughter is learning about honesty in school, so i'm setting the example...my wife hopes next week's topic is 'tact') i need to buffer or counteract with actinic bulbs of some kind. this will give me a great combination of growth and 'curb appeal.'
next question is fill in the blank:
my tank is in my office, so for the MH ballasts i should get _______.
extra credit, pick one:
a) the most cost efficient fixture available that would do what you want is the ______ and you can order it from _______.
b) to build what you want into a hood, you should order the following parts:
____
____
____
my wife is so happy you guys are helping me avoid the light issue from the start!!!
right now, all the occupants are in a 44g corner with a 175w 20k. we love the color from months 2-6, and then we forget it was blue. growth is good, but my bulb is really old right now, and i'm hoping not to replace it...so we need to speed up the new system!
thanks all,
tim
(back to page 5 on teh first half...)