2nd Nano,4th tank!!! Need pics of 20 long drilled.

EXPEDITION - Thank you I appreciate it. Myself and a friend made the overflow boxes.

In answer to your questions though. The water overflows into those blue acrylic boxes on the sides of the tank then from there flows down the plumbing inside of those boxes to the sump. The PVC is setup the way it is for noise reduction. You can do a quick search for "Durso Standpipe" to get more info on why. This config is basically an external durso. In answer to your second question... it's not noisy at all.

Hobster - Thanks. The center hole is dead center in terms of side to side. Regarding it's placement vertically I placed it as high as I could without have to modify the viewable black plastic frame of the tank. I did have to modify the tanks plastic frame on the rear back side of the tank though by cutting out maybe 3/8" worth of the plastic so the bulkhead would seat properly.

The overflow bulkheads (the upper most point of them) are maybe 5" below the top of the tank and probably 1" from the side.

I didn't drill a hole for back siphone. We just run the returns relatively close to the surface and that solves the problem.

The sump is super basic. Works great though. The big chamber on the right is for the skimmer and where the water enters the sump. The small chamber is obviously where the return pump is.
tystank017.jpg
 
Thanks for you replies and help!

Do you think there is anyway to make a small refugium in the 10 gal sump, with another baffle or would it be to small??

Is that just 2 dividers in the sump or 3?
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=8591429#post8591429 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Hobster
Thanks for you replies and help!

Do you think there is anyway to make a small refugium in the 10 gal sump, with another baffle or would it be to small??

Is that just 2 dividers in the sump or 3?

I plan on runnung a skimmerless system,so there is plenty of room 4 me.
 
Glad to help. There's only 2 baffles in the sump... thier only purpose is to keep bubbles from being returned to the display.

I don't think there is room to run a skimmer section and an effective fuge in a 10 gallon. If there would have been we'd a probably done it... refugiums are awesome.

One thing to consider EXPEDITION and the reason we went with a skimmer as oppossed to the "fuge only" route is because the 10 gallon is so small. If your pushing a decent turn-over you'll make a mess out of your refugium because of the water volume rushing through such a tiny space. Not to say it can't be done because with the right baffling it most certainly could but now we're talking about cutting into precious space for the fuge, reducing it's percentage of the overall system's volume and as a result reducing it's effectiveness. Does that make sense?

Thanks chocolateblnt!
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=8592939#post8592939 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by IsThisNameTaken?
Glad to help. There's only 2 baffles in the sump... thier only purpose is to keep bubbles from being returned to the display.

I don't think there is room to run a skimmer section and an effective fuge in a 10 gallon. If there would have been we'd a probably done it... refugiums are awesome.

One thing to consider EXPEDITION and the reason we went with a skimmer as oppossed to the "fuge only" route is because the 10 gallon is so small. If your pushing a decent turn-over you'll make a mess out of your refugium because of the water volume rushing through such a tiny space. Not to say it can't be done because with the right baffling it most certainly could but now we're talking about cutting into precious space for the fuge, reducing it's percentage of the overall system's volume and as a result reducing it's effectiveness. Does that make sense?

Thanks chocolateblnt!

Makes total sence.I have a spare AC 500 laying around,maybe i'll use that on the sump inetead.
 
Back
Top