<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=6275385#post6275385 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by GregM779
I really think you should add sand to the tank, it would look twice as nice and help with the bioload, unless of course you are going to turn it into a SPS tank.
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=6275385#post6275385 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by GregM779
I really think you should add sand to the tank, it would look twice as nice and help with the bioload, unless of course you are going to turn it into a SPS tank.
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=6279031#post6279031 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by hdtvguy
IMO it adds to your overall bio-load of your tank. With BB and high flow it gets everything out and into the sump so the skimmer can pull it out fast.
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=6275919#post6275919 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Randy Holmes-Farley
What would be the nitrogen and phosphate export method in the BB/no macroalgae version with a high fish load? Just skimming? You would then be relying on bacteria to convert the ammonia and phosphate that the fish produce into skimmable organics? Whether that can keep the nitrate and phosphate levels low enough will depend on many factors, such as size of the skimmer and your ability to keep bacterial action at appropriate (high enough) levels.
In the past, that has not always worked adequately, but perhaps with a big enough skimmer, or with bacterial action driven by adding organics such as vodka or vinegar, it will be more so.
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=6290613#post6290613 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by tgunn
Beautiful specimen! That must be the one I saw at SWC when I was in a short time ago...
Tyler