400's vs 250's

If you go with 400watt HQI bulbs and ballast (HPS 430 watt in the US), the efficiency is most certainly there. An Aquaconnect 14,000K SE is just a PAR monster... almost 2x the output of the CoralVue 12,000K and the look of a Radium. Its a HQI as well... so it will last you a year.
 
There are others that say the Double Ended bulbs are the only way to go for PAR/Watt, and others now leaning more to the HO T-5's.

I just got word that my new T-5 lighting did show up at the door today. Eight times 55 watts for a total of 440 watts, will it do as good as two 250 watt mh's plus 130 watts of compacts?
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=10862027#post10862027 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by hahnmeister
An Aquaconnect 14,000K SE is just a PAR monster... almost 2x the output of the CoralVue 12,000K and the look of a Radium. Its a HQI as well...

Did you mean the Aquaconnect is a 14,000K DE?
 
Tom, Im talking 400watters here. 250s are another story.

Dennis... the 8x54wattT5s vs. the 2x250watt halides (Im going to leave the PC bulbs out because their contributions are minimal... like an extra 30 micriMol/m2/s at the sand, so the main source would be the halides). If you like a bluer look, like 20,000K halides, then yes, I think T5s offer more punch in that spectrum in particular. IMO, nothing beats a halide and T5 combo... but thats not to say that you NEED that. 8x54wattT5s can be enough for a 120g... easlily. Enough for SPS up top, LPS, zoas, etc down below. My suggestion would be to skip actinics... their output is rather weak... and even the UVL Super Actinics show considerable dimming after just a few months. Simply put, a narrow tube like that doesnt lend itself well to keeping actinic phosphors happy. The Giesemann's seem to retain their output the most, but they are rather dull to begin with... since they are the most 'true actinic' that I have seen. The UVL's just dont seem to maintain intensity for long at all... they start out brighter than the G-mans, but 3 months later... Bill found the same thing, he says he wont buy more UVL's ever again, and his tank is only a few months old or so. Im trying the Sfiligoi actinics now, and I do like their output. Their intensity is there... but we will see how long that lasts. My Ushio 14,000Ks have loads of actinic already, so Im also considering forgetting about the actinics all together and just using blue+ bulbs. From all the German sites, it seems they dont even bother with the actinics... instead opting for just using the blue+ style bulbs in combo with some other day/actinic-day bulbs. The KZ fiji purples seem to be popular because of their blue output, but with a red spike so they appear actinic in a way through color addition. The ATI 20,000K, AquaScience 22,000K, and Giesemann 20,000Ks seem to be the staple though, used in some combo with 'aquablue' style bulbs, and a daylight bulb or two (Aquascience DUO is a favorite of mine for this). The results seem to show that the actinic output in the blue style T5s may be enough though... the results are impressive. The personal tanks of Iwan, Thomas Pohl (KZ), and a few others are testiment to this.

Just sure to keep the air flowing over these things... you lack airflow and your output will drop a good 20% and your bulb life will get very short.

Is it going to compete? Well... it depends on the bulbs you are comparing... thats what it comes down to in the end.
 
Here's what Anthony wrote to my question from another forum...

hands down... 250s get my vote. Very few home aquaria need 400 watt lamps... and the only reason more folks aren't slaughtering coral under their 400 watters is the love of blue weighted lamps that most reefers have. Nice colors... but less useful (for photosynthesis... or in this case, over-photosynthesis [photo-inhibition])

.
Anthony Calfo
 
Not to highjack a thread, but since the topic is 400 vs 250s...

I currently have 3@400W SE halides on my 180 with 3@140W VHO actinics (2 in front, 1 in back).

I've always been unhappy with the coloring (not to mention the heat) of the 400W 10000K, not because of the brightness, but because they washed out the actinic pop. 20000K were just too blue and way too dim for my taste. The 14000K were about right color-wise for the coral color, but still seemed dim compared to the 10000K "brightness" I like. Thus I've decided on going with 250W bulbs (10000K initially). Also, my current PFO 400W ballasts are HUGE (they sit on the floor) and wasteful of electricity due to the .65 PF, so I'm also going to go with small electronic ballasts mounted on top the hood (out of sight).

The MH are mounted in spiderlight reflectors. I was all set to change out the whole spiderlight reflector structure to get DE bulbs, but from what I read here the SE should work just fine for now since I already have the investment in the reflectors???

I have just read a 120 post thread on the Odyssea light fixture and the mods required vs the Maristar I was about to purchase last week. But since I already have a hood which would hide the fixture, now I'm thinking of just buying new e-ballasts only (probably the new icecap 250W in case I DO end up going with DE someday).

Does this sound reasonable?

Also, I LOVE the coloring of the VHO actinics, and at night that is all that is on so I do not want to lose that... I still read conflicting stories on whether the newer T5 super actinic bulbs give the same pop as the URI VHO, but that could also be a seperate upgrade in the future too? Then again, I loved the coloring in Bill's tank and he used T5's...

Thoughts? (I AM getting closer to buying something...)
 
It's well known fact that to get the most out a 250watt HQI lamp, you should get a magnetic HQI ballast, not an electronic ballast.
I do have electronic ballasts (EVC), but there is a trade off between getting the most PAR & watts used.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=10867466#post10867466 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by tom obrecht
Here's what Anthony wrote to my question from another forum...

hands down... 250s get my vote. Very few home aquaria need 400 watt lamps... and the only reason more folks aren't slaughtering coral under their 400 watters is the love of blue weighted lamps that most reefers have. Nice colors... but less useful (for photosynthesis... or in this case, over-photosynthesis [photo-inhibition])

.
Anthony Calfo

That doesnt really clear things up to well does it. I mean, Calfo is weighing in based on the performance of 10,000Ks... which yes, I agree. But considering the output of most 10,000K/250's is about the same as many of the bluer 400watt bulbs, like your Reeflux 12,000Ks Tom, you ARE running bulbs with the same output as many 250's.

If you check out Kostera's tank on the RC site, his PAR levels are about 20% lower than yours for the most part. And you can see what his tank looks like with a bulb of similar spectrum to yours. I say only 20% because even though his light levels are actually lower, his tank is actually grown in, and all that filling in and shadowing will eventually happen in yours as well. You said you tried going only with 3 bulbs, but that this left the sides too dark/patchy. Did you try raising the lights a bit as well I wonder? I you add an extra few inches (no more than 6"), I bet your light levels would be just the little bit lower that you are seeking, while also cutting your heat/electricity.

As for going with 250's, my only concern is that you will be taking too big of a step down for a tank as tall as yours. IF you want with 250's, then I think you would have to go with 10,000Ks... and then you would end up having to add T5s to suppliment the blue anyways. Sure, its a good option, but it would mean a complete equipment redo for lighting. I think you should be able to work with what you already have. I think if you go with 250's though, you will have too little to 'punch' past 1/2 way into the tank. Look at Josh's tank again for reference... consider his light levels in proportion to your tank... sure, you will have lumenarcs, so you will get slightly better penetration... but I think its cutting it too close. FWIW, in the long run, as the corals fill in and shade each other more, and adapt to the higher light over time, I think you will end up right back where you are at right now.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=10883472#post10883472 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Gem Tang Rider
It's well known fact that to get the most out a 250watt HQI lamp, you should get a magnetic HQI ballast, not an electronic ballast.
I do have electronic ballasts (EVC), but there is a trade off between getting the most PAR & watts used.

So in other words, you recommend sticking with the SE bulbs on the electronic ballast...
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=10881767#post10881767 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by srlumaye1
Not to highjack a thread, but since the topic is 400 vs 250s...

I currently have 3@400W SE halides on my 180 with 3@140W VHO actinics (2 in front, 1 in back).

I've always been unhappy with the coloring (not to mention the heat) of the 400W 10000K, not because of the brightness, but because they washed out the actinic pop. 20000K were just too blue and way too dim for my taste. The 14000K were about right color-wise for the coral color, but still seemed dim compared to the 10000K "brightness" I like. Thus I've decided on going with 250W bulbs (10000K initially). Also, my current PFO 400W ballasts are HUGE (they sit on the floor) and wasteful of electricity due to the .65 PF, so I'm also going to go with small electronic ballasts mounted on top the hood (out of sight).

The MH are mounted in spiderlight reflectors. I was all set to change out the whole spiderlight reflector structure to get DE bulbs, but from what I read here the SE should work just fine for now since I already have the investment in the reflectors???

I have just read a 120 post thread on the Odyssea light fixture and the mods required vs the Maristar I was about to purchase last week. But since I already have a hood which would hide the fixture, now I'm thinking of just buying new e-ballasts only (probably the new icecap 250W in case I DO end up going with DE someday).

Does this sound reasonable?

Also, I LOVE the coloring of the VHO actinics, and at night that is all that is on so I do not want to lose that... I still read conflicting stories on whether the newer T5 super actinic bulbs give the same pop as the URI VHO, but that could also be a seperate upgrade in the future too? Then again, I loved the coloring in Bill's tank and he used T5's...

Thoughts? (I AM getting closer to buying something...)

If you like the coloring of Bill's tank, then I would go T5's + halides and not look back. I prefer it myself as well. To me, the whole 'daylight' + purple light doesnt look right, because it leaves out the blue... which is what you SHOULD see the most of as you get deeper. This has been the major bonus of 20,000Kish halides... the huge blue spike does more for corals than any actinic. Not just the spectrum, but their output... its much greater than what the actinics put out per watt. The downside of the 20,000Kish halides (Reeflux 12,000Ks, Pheonix 14,000Ks, etc.) is their monochromatic look. Corals (esp red, yellow, and pink ones) can often look 'chalky' and washed out under the predominantly blue light. The major lack of daylight all together in these bulbs can leave the tank looking less than stunning. Wost case, you end up with something like what JD once had... Radiums with VHO actinics.... everything in his tank was blue and purple even if it was supposed to be red. Sure, the light color was cool, but you couldnt tell what the corals were supposed to look like. When he switched to that Maristar setup... his tank 'popped'. He has had killer acros in there all along... they were all just disguised in blue light.

Thats the appeal of the T5s + Halides. You can use a 10,000Kish bulb for the halide, get all its output and full spectrum, and then have the T5s supplimenting with loads of blue. The end result is alot like combining a 10,000K with a 20,000K... something not possible with any one halide bulb. FWIW, a 10,000K halide has more actinic than a 20,000K... loads of it... just covered up by all the daylight. What they lack is the blue spectrum... so 10,000Kish bulbs w/ blue+ style T5s is a great combo. I can understand the appeal for 'after hours' actinic viewing... but in that case then, you shouldnt be as concerned with the output compared to VHO's then... as they wont be competing with the halides. You could keep a VHO actinic if you really wanted I suppose, and just have it on a seperate switch for only coming on when you want to view... it does the tank no good otherwise.

Your bulbs are oversized though Steve. The only reason you havent scorched the tank with radiant energy alone is most likely because the reflectors are so... well... poor by today's standards. A lumenarc like Tom's will have 3x the output at most levels. At that, your lights are bright... perhaps too bright. If you want a bright halide... the Ushio/BLV nepturion 14,000Ks are PAR monsters in the 400watt version... I think they are the highest output of any 400 actually. But its perhaps overkill. One thing to keep in mind is that our eyes dont see blue light as well as green, and then red (only 10% of our cones are tuned to see blue), so what may be very bright blue to the corals and fish may be dull to you. Perhaps a visit with the PAR meter is in order. Also, there are some things that a T5 bulb can do to a coral that no halide or VHO can do... hard to explain... just have to see how dark and neon corals can get under T5s for yourself. I still have an orange whorling cap that is a neon blood red from the T5 tank.

My suggestion would be to get Lumenarc DE pendants (mini's in a black shell with a DE socket and glass). Then, Ushio 14,000Ks, and 2-4 rows of T5s... 5' T5s will do (only 6" short on each end... you wont notice, but you can stagger them if you like). If you have a Icecap660 ballast, you can run 3 5' T5s with it as is... two blue+ and an actinic should be fine. If no icecap, then some 80wattT5 ballasts/ retros from reefgeek.com. This is pretty much what Bill was using on his 120g... just 50% more for your tank which is 50% more. Similar to JD's as well, only better halide reflectors and not just the blue+ T5s (unless you go with only 2 rows of T5s). Your reflectors will be better than Bill's Hamiltons though... loads better... so dont worry about the Ushio's lower output. If you really think you need more after some time, try the Geisemann 14,500K bulbs... they are the same spectrum, only about 20-25% brighter. This setup should be plenty of light though for a 24" tall 180g though.

You might be able to make an even swap with someone, or sell the 400 watt PFOs used for what the 250wattHQI's will cost you (you are an EE, you can just buy M80 ballast kits and build them yourself and save a bundle as well... M80 spec is M80 spec in the end). The major costs will be with the reflectors... lumenarc3 DE's are at reefexotics on special right now for about $129 ea. I think. You could contact Daniel at PGS and see if he can make any of them w/o the black shell (I have seen them for $99 in the past) since you have a canopy. They are pretty much a 14" lumenarc mini with the DE socket and the glass. You could even have the 3" ducting put right on the reflector then, so you could have the heat ducted from right within the reflector itself... much better cooling. Then, the T5 retrofit kits... thats pretty straight forward.
 
On some general lighting thoughts here I have now switch completly to T-5 lighting. And here are my thoughts on the switch so far.

Brightness on a 120 gallon tank with 8-54 Watt bulb it is definatly much brighter than my prior set up on a 75 gallon with 1- 10,000K -250W MH, 1-14,000K 400W MH and 4 55 watt compacts.

Color balance. PResently I'm using 460 atinics and 10,000K bulbs. When just the atinics are on I do not like the color balance to me it seems too purple. My thoughts hee are to change one of the bulbs to a 420 Atinic and another to 50/50 bulb. The daylight mode looks great to me when all 8 bulbs are on. Actually I thionk it would be more ideal to have 3 bulbs on one line and 5 on the other rather than 4 and 4.

Growth. Well it is not long enough to tell for sure. But if algea is an indicator then things should be doing great. I have a frogspawn that is only about 3 weeks in my tank and it has shown some growth in that short toime span. Also two types of zoos with one definatly spreading (red orange) and the other not showing much change at all (blue green).

So far I'm happy with the switch to T-5's however I see some experimenting with bulbs comming up and need to wait for long range results.

Dennis
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=10884422#post10884422 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by srlumaye1
So in other words, you recommend sticking with the SE bulbs on the electronic ballast...

No, but to get the most out of an HQI lamp, use an HQI ballast. SE lamps are out dated IMO, & the HQI's are still more efficient than a mogul lamp on an electronic ballast. The HQI ballast makes the HQI 14K Phoenix lamps look more white. On my EVC ballasts they looked more blue. I ended up switching to the Ushio 14K's to get a more balanced look.

I have 3 PFO mini pendants, with 250watt HQI 14K Ushios, & 2 x 80watt T5 Blue+ lamps.

Also you can use your old VHO ballasts for T5 lamps as long as you have the wattage rating.

Lots of choices, but it's yours in the end.
 
Last edited:
Tom is right... unless you are looking at 400 watters (the HQIs are SE at the 400 level), most HQI bulbs are only DE. Most probe-starts (low pressure, probe start startup circuit which 'spatters' like the starters on tube bulbs and causes darkening) are in SE. There are a couple exceptions though...

250wattSE Radiums are actually HQI rated (400s are really 360 watt bulbs and nothing near HQI rated, let alone 400s).

Most Ushio/BLV bulbs (colorlite, nepturion, aqualite) as long as they arent CWA models (cheaper probe start bulbs they sometimes send to the US), are actually HQI SE bulbs.

Giesemann 250wattSE bulbs are actually HQI as well (they are just rebadged Ushio).

Aquaconnect 250's are also HQI (similar to pheonix).

The thing is, with the exception of the Radium, all these bulbs come in DE as well, and then you have the choice of all the other DE bulbs as well... and the DE bulbs are usually cheaper then as well.

As for the VHO ballast running T5s.... it depends on the ballast. Icecap 660/430... sure. Coralife or Aromat... no.
 
Dennis, which T5 kit did you go with? Which reflectors/ballasts? Are you using fans? Which bulbs? I can make a suggestion on which T5s (I have a collection of almost every T5 bulb made for spectral testing and PAR testing) might suit you better based on what you are using now.
 
Present set up is a Nova Ertreme . Yes it has 4 fans two on each end. (Which makes my canopy design an issue.)

For bulbs I have Current 4 10,000K and 4 460nm.

Long range plan is to swap some 420 nm in place of two of the 460's alos a 6,500K in place of one of the 10,000K.

Any additional ideas.
 
My suggestion would be to get Lumenarc DE pendants (mini's in a black shell with a DE socket and glass). Then, Ushio 14,000Ks, and 2-4 rows of T5s... 5' T5s will do (only 6" short on each end... you wont notice, but you can stagger them if you like). If you have a Icecap660 ballast, you can run 3 5' T5s with it as is... two blue+ and an actinic should be fine. If no icecap, then some 80wattT5 ballasts/ retros from reefgeek.com. This is pretty much what Bill was using on his 120g... just 50% more for your tank which is 50% more. Similar to JD's as well, only better halide reflectors and not just the blue+ T5s (unless you go with only 2 rows of T5s). Your reflectors will be better than Bill's Hamiltons though... loads better... so dont worry about the Ushio's lower output. If you really think you need more after some time, try the Geisemann 14,500K bulbs... they are the same spectrum, only about 20-25% brighter. This setup should be plenty of light though for a 24" tall 180g though.

You might be able to make an even swap with someone, or sell the 400 watt PFOs used for what the 250wattHQI's will cost you (you are an EE, you can just buy M80 ballast kits and build them yourself and save a bundle as well... M80 spec is M80 spec in the end). The major costs will be with the reflectors... lumenarc3 DE's are at reefexotics on special right now for about $129 ea. I think. You could contact Daniel at PGS and see if he can make any of them w/o the black shell (I have seen them for $99 in the past) since you have a canopy. They are pretty much a 14" lumenarc mini with the DE socket and the glass. You could even have the 3" ducting put right on the reflector then, so you could have the heat ducted from right within the reflector itself... much better cooling. Then, the T5 retrofit kits... thats pretty straight forward.

Hahn (and everyone else),

Thanks for taking the time to help out. After reading a LOT of threads in reef central on lighting, I see you all OVER the place!

All research obviously backed up all you stated, including what used to be my top of the line spider reflectors... :D


Did you mean for me to get the:

Lumenarc DE HQI Stealth Reflector
250 DE HQI Bulbs Glass Shield included
13" x 12" x 7" H

This version does not have a black housing and is made to be mounted into an existing hood or hung over the aquarium with the outside silver reflector shell visible. Supplied with two eye bolts for hanging, glass shield and all wiring assembled.

$109.99 SALE $99.99 at ReefExotics.com

or the Double-Ended Lumenarc III Mini Stealth DE 250/400W are 14.5" x 14.5" x 7".

Also highly recommended in other threads was the following:
Reef Optix III fixtures have the same features as the Reef Optix I but are for use with HQI bulbs. These fixtures include tempered glass lenses and fit 250W double-ended HQI bulbs. Fixtures measure 11” L x 9” W x 4” H, with a 15’ lamp-to-ballast cable.

I do like the 4" height of the Reef Optix III better as it gives more room to place my T5 bulbs. I have 10.5" height in my hood. I have a 1/4" standoff, the spiders take 5.5", and the VHO's take 3" which gives me plenty of room to slide the front two VHO's towards the back of the tank when I need to get my hands into the tank. If the T5's can be mounted within 2.5", than the 7" reflector would JUST fit and allow me to use the 14.5" and MAYBE squeeze in 4-T5's although for not very long if the MH were on... Only 8" room to get my hands, etc into the front of the tank though...


While I really wanted the electronic ballasts so that I could hide them on top the tank, I do agree that the testing shows the M80 ballast will drive the DE bulbs to a much higher PAR without shortening the life of the bulbs.
I priced out an M80 ballast kit at $89 each (only placed looked so far).

I suppose I'll just have to retrofit the two existing Dual PFO ballasts I have and find a place to "hide" them...


Thus I've settled on the following so far:

DE bulbs with an M80 ballast remounted into my existing case. Will convert the VHO to T5 using existing IC660.

Still in question: The exact reflector to use for the MH. The quantity of T5s and have not even started looking at the best reflector for the T5 yet...

Final thought on (or point me to a thread on) the best MH reflector?

Thanks again.
Steve
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=10889832#post10889832 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by TropTrea
Present set up is a Nova Ertreme . Yes it has 4 fans two on each end. (Which makes my canopy design an issue.)

For bulbs I have Current 4 10,000K and 4 460nm.

Long range plan is to swap some 420 nm in place of two of the 460's alos a 6,500K in place of one of the 10,000K.

Any additional ideas.

Thats what I figured. You get what you pay for in the end. Im actually shocked that you say they are as bright as you say. A fixture with individual reflectors like an Aquatinics has about 3x the output for the same wattage. Also, those bulbs wont last long... they are cheap chinese made ones. Sorry, I dont mean to be harsh, but light it light, and your setup wont get the job done like something with individual parabolic reflectors.

As for bulbs... a great combo with 8 bulbs would be...

3x ATI blue+
2x ATI aquablue+
2x UVL Super Actinic/Sfiligoi Actinic/Giesemann True actinic (all have their merits)
1x GE 3000K
 
Steve, Im talking about this... 14.5"W x 14.5"L x 7"H
http://lumenarclighting.com/proddetail.asp?prod=LA3-Stealth-DE

I have one and it just rocks. Sadly, it was too large to fit over my new tank with all the T5s since its 14.5" wide.

The one one this page might be for you if you need something a bit smaller...
http://www.reefexotics.com/lumenarc.htm
$99, and 13" x 12" x 7" H, the one you pointed out I believe.

There is also this one by CoralVue (its a lumenarc that PGS is suing CoralVue over) http://www.aquacave.com/detail.aspx?ID=1209

The thing is, I know Daniel from PGS, and he tells me that if you just call PGS, they can work with you to make just about anything you want. In your case, you might want the DE reflector... maybe the 'mini' which is 14x14, or maybe the one that is even a bit smaller (he has even made full size lumenarcs, 19x19, with DE sockets. You most likely dont need the black shell though... so that would be a savings to you. But, you might like the ducting add-on so you can duct air directly from the bulbs to the outside. If you contact him, he can get you what you want, and he will price it just as competitively as any of the other vendors... since he is the one who makes them (er, rather, its his family that owns PGS).

Okay, here goes. You have an icecap 660, thats great. You can run 5' T5 bulbs, 3 of them, with a slight overdrive (only 6%, so nothing crazy like the 4' ones which are overdriven about 25%). These bulbs will be 300 watts, and each T5 reflector is 2.75" wide (Icecap doesnt make 5' reflectors, so the next best is the Tek 2, actually a very nice reflector that can be better than the IC depending on how you use it). If you use 2x ATI blue+, and one Actinic bulb (the UVL would be a good pick), you will have loads of blue to compete with the 10,000Kish halides. So thats 8.25" thick. The opening on your tank should be about 22"... so thats 13.75" left. You could go two ways here. You could squeeze a VHO actinic in (so on its own timer+ ballast, you could have after hours 'actinic' time). Then you would go with the smaller reflector. Or, if you packed them in, maybe tilting a T5 reflector a little to the side or something to get back 1/4 inch, you could get the 14"x14" lumenarc reflectors in there. OR you can get the smaller reflectors, not add the VHO or additional actinic bulb, and call it a day... leaving the extra space for future possibilities... like a strip of actinic/420nm LED's for late-night fun.

On the PFO ballasts... I would just sell your 400's as they are. They are worth more like that. Then, M80 ballasts arent that heavy on their own... its the huge extruded heatsink that PFO uses to shed the heat. Rather than use fans/venting, PFO uses a massive aluminum heatsink to shed the heat. You can easily pack three M80 ballasts in something smaller, lighter, etc. and use it like you would an electronic ballast. A breaker box... ammo box, mini computer case (built in fans then too). All good options.
 
Some things to keep in mind here Is that I'm looking more at LPS and Softies than at SPS corals. Most of the color full SPS corals are the high light users compared to the Softies and LPS corals.

Another thing is going with the next step up in T-5 fixtures doubles the cost and that is without bulbs. At that price I could buy 2-250W fixtures with XM10,000K's plus a T-5 Fixture or VHO for atinic power. Visably the new T-5 fixture of mine is definatly brighter to the naked eye than my old metal hide and Compacts I had.

Now to the bulb selection.
I can see the 2 Super Atinics being on the long cycle but which other bulbs should I have on that cycle? I like the mostly blue cast I have now for the "sunrise-sunset" period so I hesitate in adding to much "white" into that part of the cycle.

I can see the 3,000K instead of the 6,500K I was considering as from my fresh water experience there are some forms of photosynthetic chemicals that do like the red light.

I think the best first step might be replacing 2 of the 460 atinics with the super atinics and one of the present 10,000K's with a 3,000K.

Now my only fear is with 7 of the 8 bulbs adding to the blue end of the spectrum things might get excessively blue?

Dennis

<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=10892022#post10892022 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by hahnmeister
Thats what I figured. You get what you pay for in the end. Im actually shocked that you say they are as bright as you say. A fixture with individual reflectors like an Aquatinics has about 3x the output for the same wattage. Also, those bulbs wont last long... they are cheap chinese made ones. Sorry, I dont mean to be harsh, but light it light, and your setup wont get the job done like something with individual parabolic reflectors.

As for bulbs... a great combo with 8 bulbs would be...

3x ATI blue+
2x ATI aquablue+
2x UVL Super Actinic/Sfiligoi Actinic/Giesemann True actinic (all have their merits)
1x GE 3000K
 
Back
Top