75 gallon tank mh

Sorry, been a busy day.

The HQI spec is a newer international standard that is AKA M80 for 250wattDE bulbs. It is perhaps the highest grade halide ballast you can buy. The bulbs are designed to be run at a higher current, for higher output, with higher pressure in the bulbs. The result is longer life, more lumens/watt, less color shifting, etc. AND, it also means that the bulbs can be run in a horizontal manner w/o the inner arc depositing the halides on the outer wall of the bulb. Almost all SE bulbs are low pressure, american standard, probe start halides. They dont last as long, have the color life, or the output of a DE bulb. I know people running 250wattDE bulbs for 3 years, easily... you would never get an SE bulb to last that long and still be functional.

Another thing is to match up bulbs with ballast. Simply running a 250wattSE bulb on a HQI ballast is like running a car on jet-fuel. It will have a short, but glorious life... then die. 250watt HQI ballasts might as well be named 300watt ballasts, to help differentiate them from regular 250s like 150s are different from 175s. Underdriving a halide bulb is just as bad as overdriving, and for this reason, HQI ballasts are the best choice for DE bulbs. Electronic ballasts do better at prolonging the otherwise short lives of probe-start SE bulbs, but on pulse-start DE bulbs, they dont get the job done. After time, the gases in the tube that are not excited into making light instead deposit themselves on the outer wall of the tube... burning. This not only takes their potential output from the bulb, but also blocks the output of the remaining gasses. Underdriving is just as bad as overdriving.

As for 'cheaping out'... dont do it. If anything, buy one now, and the other later. Those ebay ballasts are cheap M58 ballasts... US spec probe start ballasts designed to run low-pressure SE bulbs. They are often the same ballasts that end up humming like mad... the ones you see in those 'high-bay' bell pendants at the local warehouse or 'big box' stores. They tend to burn bulbs faster, and often yellow bluer bulbs much faster.

The best matchups are SE bulbs with e-ballasts and DE bulbs with HQI ballasts. In the future, you will start to see less and less SE bulbs, as more companies are switching to the better spec 100%. Most of the newer, better bulbs are DE format. Also, some of the best bulbs you can get in 250wattDE are getting dirt cheap... pheonix 14,000K for $55, Ushio 14,000K or EVC 10,000-14,000-20,000K bulbs for $60-65. CoralVue Reeflux 10,000K and 12,000Ks... (I can get those for $50 each).

Good SE bulbs are getting harder and harder to find. Most german/EU companies dont even bother with them anymore (Giesemann, Tunze, Elos, Fauna-Marin... etc). The ballast and reflectors might cost more, but the bulbs are getting plentiful and cheaper every month it seems.

I wont even touch mogul bulbs FWIW... just not worth it.

You can skimp on the reflectors for now... get the $30 ones right now if you want (and you have a canopy to mount them in). They wont be as bright, er rather.. well distributed as the lumenarcs (they will spotlight more... be less spread out), but they can get you by. That woud bring down your cost to $130x2 for ballasts, $55-60 x 2 for bulbs, and $60 in reflectors. Then you can upgrade the reflectors later. I just figure, if its a matter of you know you are going to buy them anyways, why waste the $60 now?

As for actinics, with 20,000Ks you wont need them, no. If anything, I would consider a daylight bulb for some supplimental daylight... lol... some 20,000Ks are very blue/purple and little of anything else. I like the EVCs... tons of actinic and blue... but a good PAR and some good daylight output as well. I consider it a very complete bulb.

OR... there is still the T5 option... that would be my pick for a 75g.... either a 6x54 or 8x54watt setup... Im tellin you... you corals might need a 90g to keep from melting...lol.
 
Thank you there is alot of very good informatoin there. I guess I am building a canopy and heard so many good things about mh bulbs I wanted to do something like that instead of the T5.

So you dont think the Icecap ballast would be a good fit with EVC 20,000K 250wattDE bulbs?

You think its best to just run the 2 mh bulbs over 10k bulbs with actinic?

Half my reasoning for the mh is hopefully it is stuff that will still be useful if I ever upgrade tanks.
 
Your long winded post makes me laugh. Either this guy has a bigger budget than he led on or you should stick to making skimmers. Either way your input is greatly appceciated. Thanks
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=9414713#post9414713 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by gguertin
Thank you there is alot of very good informatoin there. I guess I am building a canopy and heard so many good things about mh bulbs I wanted to do something like that instead of the T5.

So you dont think the Icecap ballast would be a good fit with EVC 20,000K 250wattDE bulbs?

You think its best to just run the 2 mh bulbs over 10k bulbs with actinic?

Half my reasoning for the mh is hopefully it is stuff that will still be useful if I ever upgrade tanks.

Its alright... you lose about 20% of the output though, and IME, the icecaps dont give you the longevity like the M80 ballasts do. I have pheonix 14,000Ks that ran on HQI and Icecaps, and the M80 ones still have 85-90% of their output after a year. The Icecap ones have 60% of their output. I measured with a PAR meter. The Icecaps do run the bulbs bluer though.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=9414756#post9414756 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Urban_Squrill
I hate to go off topic but would a 8 bulb t5 setup allow you to keep just about any coral/clam?

A 6 bulb setup, depending on the bulbs you pick and the brand of reflector/unit could keep anything. I have a 6x39 over one 40B, and two 250wattDEs over two other 40Bs, and by far, the best looking tank is the T5 lit one. The PAR readings are very similar... the halide has a hot spot in the center, and the T5s spread out that light more. It makes them more useful IMO... you can put corals anywhere and they do well.

The only exception is some lower light corals... see... T5s penetrate more because they are so spread out. If you want to keep lower light species you can do one of two things...
1. get a taller tank. This provides the multiple light zones you will need to keep open-brains, GSP, pipe-organ, etc on the bottom w/o too much light.
2. less lights... but that means less light at the top as well... so its a mixed solution. I do know people with a mere 3 T5 bulbs over their 40B tanks and its great for LPS, softies, etc... and only 117 watts!
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=9414813#post9414813 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by celano
Your long winded post makes me laugh. Either this guy has a bigger budget than he led on or you should stick to making skimmers. Either way your input is greatly appceciated. Thanks

Hey, most of the time when people claim they dont have the money, they really do... they may have just set a budget. The best way to get around this when it might be in a person's best interest is to sell them the value of the better setup. If that $650 setup saves him $100 per year in bulbs for the next few years... thats a benefit worth paying for.

As for MH vs. T5... there are plenty of threads on that. I would consider 4' T5s to be very versitile though, and if you are concerned about future upgrades, you can use a retrofit kit... then when you upgrade to that 8' tank in the future, you can still use the T5s.

You may see more with halides because they have a long history, and in America, it seems people are slow to adopt new technologies. In the EU, T5s are outselling halides by a wide margin now. The only way you even see halide fixtures at shows is when they have supplimental T5s built in as well. They really are just as capable as halides, and in some ways, a more effective light for our reefing needs.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=9414935#post9414935 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by hahnmeister
Hey, most of the time when people claim they dont have the money, they really do... they may have just set a budget. The best way to get around this when it might be in a person's best interest is to sell them the value of the better setup. If that $650 setup saves him $100 per year in bulbs for the next few years... thats a benefit worth paying for.

As for MH vs. T5... there are plenty of threads on that. I would consider 4' T5s to be very versitile though, and if you are concerned about future upgrades, you can use a retrofit kit... then when you upgrade to that 8' tank in the future, you can still use the T5s.

You may see more with halides because they have a long history, and in America, it seems people are slow to adopt new technologies. In the EU, T5s are outselling halides by a wide margin now. The only way you even see halide fixtures at shows is when they have supplimental T5s built in as well. They really are just as capable as halides, and in some ways, a more effective light for our reefing needs.

I see what your sayin Hahn...and I hate to agree with you, but it makes sense. I've been to Europe several times, and well....I miss it. Mostly I miss the architecture and the land scapes.....but its the people I miss the most......Bah never mind. Your lighting setup is wrong....zzzzz nvm......blah

EDIT: Dont you hold this against me you EU sob.:D
 
Last edited:
I agree with Hahnmeister that to get the most out of a limited budget is to set things right the first time, if it is within your means.

I learn this the hard ways, in my old system I skimp and DIYed a lot of stuffs, guess what? The constant fixing and replacement of equipment cost me even more, not to mention the time wasted. This time round on my new tank I buy the right stuffs slowly, yes it takes more time to save up and get everything needed, but and I am much happier in the end.
 
Having a big budget, there is always money with tax returns but how much should you really spend on the aquarium before you pay off other bills.... lol so I am trying to find a happy median.

As for lights everytime I think I made a decision I hear something that changes my mind. I have never looked into T5's because I "assumed" halides were better, so I have some research to do.

Hahn I have seen you recomend T5's in other threads now so I am curious what setup you believe will give me the most for my money... You mentioned one earlier

"A 6x54wattT5 retrofit for example a Tek retrofit from reefgeek is $449 with the bulbs. Its only 324 watts, but closer to the water, and more even output than the halide"

Is that on par with the mh setup you recommended in the begining? I agree with all of you cheaping out when it comes to this is not good and something that will save me money in the long run is very appealing, but the stand and canopy I have built for this thing has taken some time and effort, obviously I have no problem with trying a diy retrofit as thats what I was planning so if you have 4-500 to spend what is the best I can get?

If you really think T5's are the future it seems thats the way to go... As I said I have some research to do, thanks guys.
 
This is a dumb questing but a curious one to see if its been answered. I have read many threads showing how t5 get almost the same using less electricity, their cheaper, less heat overall resolves most of the negatives to metal halides.

However has anyone done a comparison on their tank between T5 and mh? Take a picture b4 and after the switch? I read a few threads that say the T5's lose the shimmer effect, I am curious as to what they actually look like on a tank, what is the visual difference?
 
You do lose a lot of the shimmer effect, if you want to see the difference just go to any decent LFS and I'm sure you will be able to spot which tanks use halides and which use T5 lights.
 
Im following this thread, as Im trying to figure out lighting for my 75 gallon also. thank you hahn for all the good info. I agree with you guys that t5 is the way to go because it is just so much more practicle, but man......I love that shimmer effect lol - I might have to throw out the obvious choice (t5's), and get mh just for the shimmer.
 
btw....am I wrong, but I dont see why 150HQI w/ good reflectors and HQI ballast wouldnt work. It would help keep down heat issues.
 
I guess im torn between the 2? hoping to find some info to push me one way or the other. Seems t5's are cheaper to operate but I have never personally seen a tank lit with t5's, that really makes it hard to make a decision.
 
A friend of mine has a beautiful tank that is light with T5 lighting, its a 110 like mine and 30" tall. He is able to keep SPS with no difficulty, but I wouldn't trade in the shimmer of my halides.
 
This is a very big reason why I am unsure of what to get! Of all the decisions to make about your tank this one sucks the most! I am curious how a single ended mh setup with icecap ballasts would perform compared to these newer setups. Now that new setups are available it seems the icecaps and older style bulbs are really coming down in price.. But like I said this decision sucks every other part of reef tanks seems a little more cut and dry.
 
anyone got any links to the best bang for your buck on the mh or t5's as a retrofit package? Anyone that has gotten anything lately with pics, or tanks on this site somewhere that are using t5's?
 
Back
Top