<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=15736531#post15736531 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Lightsluvr
I like Billybeau1's objective tests a lot more than the opinion, rumor and innuendo on the above thread... JMHO.
I am still buying RC in 200G boxes and re-mixing it myself when I pour it into 160G RC buckets for storage.
So far, BB1's results are meshed with mine, except for some funky ALK numbers caused by my test kits.
Thanks BB1
LL
Interesting thread, thanks for the link.
Unfortunately, it seems that this hobby is 25% science and 75% opinion, rumor, and conjecture. When corroborated, those opinions, etc. often become anecdotal evidence. When (if ever) they are scientifically proved or disproved, they may well become scientific fact. But when most of the day-to-day 'research' is being done by hobbyists or by companies trying to sell you stuff or protect their market share, it's prudent to be skeptical. Still, that doesn't mean the anecdotal evidence and suppositions don't have merit. Objectivity is wonderful and necessary, but an objective account more often than not does not tell the entire story.
My test figures on the RC mix also agree with yours and Billybeau1's. I also agree with BB1's earlier comment that your eyes are the best test kit (sorry, I may have paraphrased slightly). My eyes tell me that some of my tank inhabitants survived but did not thrive with one salt mix, while they did and do thrive with a different salt mix.
You can call that 'innuendo' if you like, though that's a derogatory term that neither fits the discussion nor is it deserved. Rumor? Well, possibly, but then practically anything could be called as such, particularly in forums like these. Opinion, certainly, and everybody should have one. I'll stick to calling it what it is: experience, be it good, bad, or just plain dumb.
Thanks to all of those sharing their experiences. It makes better hobbyists of us all.