Will do, ThanksJust put it on acclimation mode 30% for 1 month or so. I have a prime hd running the 24" profile on my 15" deep anemone cube.
![]()
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Will do, ThanksJust put it on acclimation mode 30% for 1 month or so. I have a prime hd running the 24" profile on my 15" deep anemone cube.
![]()
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Will do, Thanks
By the way I love those lagoon tanks the dimensions are perfect. It would make a great clown and haddoni carpet nem tank.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Quality of the tank is amazing. I updated the factory return pump to a sicce for more flow. Using the Hydra 26hd on it with bracket looks great
ok, finally got my hydra 52 hd. going to use it on a 24x24x19 tank with mostly sps.
is the aip for sps the AB+12awl and AB+24awl found in the onedrive link a few pages back?
is there any write up or a little bit more detailed description on what the aip files are doing? Like why does the intensity go up and down every 20 minutes?
thanks.
Found this in ecotech website
http://ecotechmarine.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Ecotech_CoralLab_WP1.pdf
It describes the SPS AB+ schedule.
It does not contain any of that up and down every twenty minutes intensity change. Was that added randomly? What is the rationale behind that?
I wonder if the same principal can be applied to Radions? I have set the gen 4 Radions on my big tank to simulate the peaks like the Hhydras. Let's see how things work out.Yes that is the article/study by WWC and Ecotech that I based the AB+ schedule off of. I then built upon that and added what are called respiration peaks to the schedule which is essentially simulated cloud cover. Out in the real world corals do not receive 12 hrs a day of sun uninterrupted 365 days a year. Clouds often pass over providing a temporary reprieve from the intense sunshine. These periods of rest allow for periods throughout the day for the coral to divert resources to use the glucose produced during photosynthesis to make ATP during daylight hours. With constant intense lighting with no breaks you can theoretically hit a wall or photo-inhibition state where the coral has no more room to store glucose and photosynthesis will cease all together. The study you cited above vaguely touches on this by stating they reduced the amount of time they run their lights after they switched to LED lighting. The reason they ran into a wall and had to reduce the photoperiod is because of the way LED's produce light in specific radiation bands. Take Cree 450nm diodes for instance, they only produce light at the 450nm wavelength and nothing else. Exciting zooxanthelli in such specific high value bands of radiation is great because nothing is wasted but is bad because nothing is wasted. Thus the respiration peaks are added in an attempt to circumvent this limitation and allow for a full 12 hr photoperiod to maximize photosynthetic potential/growth. I hope that answers your question.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I wonder if the same principal can be applied to Radions? I have set the gen 4 Radions on my big tank to simulate the peaks like the Hhydras. Let's see how things work out.
Yes that is the article/study by WWC and Ecotech that I based the AB+ schedule off of. I then built upon that and added what are called respiration peaks to the schedule which is essentially simulated cloud cover. Out in the real world corals do not receive 12 hrs a day of sun uninterrupted 365 days a year. Clouds often pass over providing a temporary reprieve from the intense sunshine. These periods of rest allow for periods throughout the day for the coral to divert resources to use the glucose produced during photosynthesis to make ATP during daylight hours. With constant intense lighting with no breaks you can theoretically hit a wall or photo-inhibition state where the coral has no more room to store glucose and photosynthesis will cease all together. The study you cited above vaguely touches on this by stating they reduced the amount of time they run their lights after they switched to LED lighting. The reason they ran into a wall and had to reduce the photoperiod is because of the way LED's produce light in specific radiation bands. Take Cree 450nm diodes for instance, they only produce light at the 450nm wavelength and nothing else. Exciting zooxanthelli in such specific high value bands of radiation is great because nothing is wasted but is bad because nothing is wasted. Thus the respiration peaks are added in an attempt to circumvent this limitation and allow for a full 12 hr photoperiod to maximize photosynthetic potential/growth. I hope that answers your question.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yes thank you, that answers my question.
So what does the "weather" feature do? Doesn't that add cloud activity? And more randomly?
Yes and stupid lighting strikes... When I first bought the lights I turned that feature on and thought I had a ghost in my house until I figured out it was the light [emoji23]. Also, it dims the light way too much ime.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I have a Hydra 26 HD over a Reefer 170 at 12" AWL. The tank is 100% LPS and I'm wondering what an appropriate lighting program would be. I've tried the AB+ settings, but some of the brains don't seem to respond well and have lost a bit of color. I notice that my LFS tends to have much dimmer LED lighting over their LPS, so should I just reduce the intensity of the AB+ settings? Thanks for your input!
I have 3 Hydra 52HDs over a 4' long tank (48L x 28W x 24H), with the lights positioned 12" over the water line. I started using the AB+ 12AWL program but was wondering with 3 fixtures over the tank, should I scale back the peak numbers to account for it?
How many fixtures per foot is everyone using? Should I just be running 2 fixtures over a 4' long tank with this program?
I do have access to a par meter from a LFS, but wanted to get other people's experience with this program and number of units first before adding more SPS.
Yes that is the article/study by WWC and Ecotech that I based the AB+ schedule off of. I then built upon that and added what are called respiration peaks to the schedule which is essentially simulated cloud cover. Out in the real world corals do not receive 12 hrs a day of sun uninterrupted 365 days a year. Clouds often pass over providing a temporary reprieve from the intense sunshine. These periods of rest allow for periods throughout the day for the coral to divert resources to use the glucose produced during photosynthesis to make ATP during daylight hours. With constant intense lighting with no breaks you can theoretically hit a wall or photo-inhibition state where the coral has no more room to store glucose and photosynthesis will cease all together. The study you cited above vaguely touches on this by stating they reduced the amount of time they run their lights after they switched to LED lighting. The reason they ran into a wall and had to reduce the photoperiod is because of the way LED's produce light in specific radiation bands. Take Cree 450nm diodes for instance, they only produce light at the 450nm wavelength and nothing else. Exciting zooxanthelli in such specific high value bands of radiation is great because nothing is wasted but is bad because nothing is wasted. Thus the respiration peaks are added in an attempt to circumvent this limitation and allow for a full 12 hr photoperiod to maximize photosynthetic potential/growth. I hope that answers your question.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk