<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=6632788#post6632788 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by collective21
![]()
THIS IS AN AMMONIA PROBLEM![]()
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=6632786#post6632786 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by roxy6684
my tank is about a month old, I have 50lbs live rock, live sand, and two fish, and have a eheim canister, and coralife super skimmer, and my temp is 82, sg is 1.026, amm is 6.0, nitrat is 0, nitrite is 0, alk is good and ph is 8.2
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=6632913#post6632913 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by stevebydac
(The reason why it is preferable NOT to do a water change is so that you can get the biggest buildup of good bacteria to handle the loads you will place on them when you start feeding a bunch of fish).
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=6633002#post6633002 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by TekCat
Here we go againI don't mean to be a smart-a$$, but....
good bacteria mostly lives on the surfaces of sand and rocks. Granted that there are some free floating in water column, however by doing water changes you'll lose very small amount of it (hardly noticeble, and insignificant). On the other side water change will export excess ammonia/nitrite/nitrate/proteins/etc... out of water column so your fish and other creatures on LR will have better chances of surviving the cycle.
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=6633209#post6633209 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by stevebydac
I understand where the bacteria live
My position is: more ammonia in the water = more bacteria breeding on the rocks, etc.
which is preferable (to me) to: removing some ammonia in the water=less bacteria breeding on the rocks, etc.
We both know what we're talking about. We just have different preferences for cycling the tank, both of which work.![]()