<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=10364900#post10364900 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by Dawman
Sorry but you are wrong .
Here is some of the actual research on Bio-Spira .
http://www.marineland.com/science/nspira.asp
Yet you exclude live sand , the sand has the bacteria just like Bio-Spira does .
Wow, this is turning into a infomercial for marineland...
Ok, as I have stated that the "research" come from a bias source and is extremely dated. The two most recent articles from the site you posted (I read them before I postedm orginal opinion) and they are:
Paul C. Burrell, Carol M. Phalen, and Timothy A. Hovanec Ph.D.. Identification of Bacteria Responsible for Ammonia Oxidation in
Freshwater Aquaria. APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, Dec.
2001, p. 5791-5800
Hovanec, T. A., L. T. Taylor, A. Blakis and E. F. DeLong.
1998. Nitrospira- Like Bacteria Associated with Nitrite Oxidation in
Freshwater Aquaria. Applied and Environmental Microbiology Vol. 64, No. 1: 258-264.
Like earlier posts, people have claimed that they put fish in the very next day, so how is that now a "quickfix" when thi hobby considers a year to be a short-term milemarker.
I excluded livesand because I have no person experience with the product(s)... and I also want to state that live sand it NOT sand with added bacteria, but rather a different type of product... we should not confuse the definition, please.
Slakker is right, we should be listening for country's updates. We should offer more generistic advice such as to add skimming, and refugium to promote a good tank... not just act as paid marineland sponsors
(PS: I have used BioSpira and it is just above the Skilter as a worthless investment)