Asking for some pix

I am interested in any pix of adult bristletooth tangs that anyone might have. I like the two spotted/Ctenochaetus binotatus best so far, but have seen some really ugly adults, that appear to just be brown and lack the striping and subtle beauty of the others I've seen. I am most interested in the two spotted and the cheveron.

Also would like pix of your powder browns or Acanthurus japonicus, as it is truly identified.

Thanks.
 
Cant' help you with the first one but here is my Acanthurus japonicus. Oh and I love this fish.


100_3050.jpg

100_3053.jpg

100_3057.jpg
 
Very nice set-up and fish you have there jpa0741!!! Thanks for the pix. I love the natural layout of the rock work. What experiences can you relay about this fish?
 
Last edited:
Take a look at the Blue-spotted Kole/Square-tail Bristle tooth, I think it is C. truncatus. I have one but have never been able to get a good pic. They can be hard to get at times but I got lucky when I got this fish as it was mislabeled as C. stirosus.

IMG_1913.jpg


This is the best pic I have but it looks much better in person.
 
I do find that fish to be very attractive as well, but the picture on liveaquaria.com of Ctenochaetus binotatus, has be sold on the two spot. There are prettier tangs for sure, but I like to use some more subdued colored fish in my dispaly as well. I think it looks too idealic and unnatural to have all of the fish be in breath-taking hues. Not that you C. truncatus is too gauday, just thought I'd explain, before someone commented on how much more attractive another, more eye catching tang was. Thanks for the picture of your very attractive tang.
 
Wow, just re-read my post and seriously mis-spelled C.strigosus.
Anyway,I understand what your saying, it is a very personal choice. I have seen pics of the two-spot and thought it may have been a better choice. One came in at the LFS a few weeks back and it did not look nearly as nice in the store as it did in the pics. If you get the oportunity try to view these fish in person before making your decision.

They are all very nice and have there own individual appeal. Best of luck in your decision.
 
Thanks so much for the very nice pictures. All fish are attractive in their own right and for what they are, a model of adaptation, that enables them to survive in their given niche. I just like creating a balanced look in my tank, by mixing subdued colors with bright, more colorful fish. To me, a powder blue tang is undeniably beautiful, but in the confines of my aquarium, I would find its colors too overpowering and garish. The idea behind my choices is create the look of a natural representation of a portion of the reef, having all brightly colored fishes appears selected and planned to me, so I mix in things like the powder brown. A powder brown or C. binotatus is still an incredible fish, but not the same as a yellow, purple, regal, or powder blue tang. I appreciate all of the fish in these pix for their beauty that takes a closer look to really appreciate.
 
Interesting, you are the second person to comment like that on the Powder Blue. But I have to tell you, at least in my tank, its colors don't stand out garishly at all...
FTSfront2-22-08.jpg
 
But I do love all the subtle orange spots and marks on my tomini (virtually impossible to capture in a pic)....
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=13220539#post13220539 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by SDguy
Interesting, you are the second person to comment like that on the Powder Blue. But I have to tell you, at least in my tank, its colors don't stand out garishly at all...
FTSfront2-22-08.jpg


You have a gorgeous tank. Very nice.
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=13220539#post13220539 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by SDguy
Interesting, you are the second person to comment like that on the Powder Blue. But I have to tell you, at least in my tank, its colors don't stand out garishly at all...
FTSfront2-22-08.jpg

You are correct, the PBT looks appropriate in your set-up. Some reasons it does not stand out garishly in your tank are:
A) You have a tank with more depth than mine or it least the illusion of depth.
B) Your backdrop of brightly colored corals sets a stage for colorful fish and allows it to stand out appropriately from the many pink-toned corals.
C) Your other fish choices lend to a bright blue fish.
The chromis and anthias allow for it, both in size and color, by mixing with the backdrop of coral colors and allowing the PBT to look appropriate.

In my purposed tank, I have already chosen several fish that are beautiful, but not b/c of striking color, but b/c of contrast. For example, banggaii cardinal, Copper banded butterfly, and a leopard wrasse. I also stick with odd numbers in ''fishscapeing'', when I can, so for me, my tank needed either three larger fish or a single, roaming, knockout specimen. I chose the CBB, a PbrownT, and the C.bionotatus, so far. The different shapes and pattern allow them to not be the largest fish in the tank and showy, but not so much, that they are the focus and the smaller fish get missed. For pops of color, I chose C. parasema or yellow tailed damsels. Very bright, contrast, and activity, also able to be kept in an odd number of three. Red firefish, are another odd numbered choice.
You can tell, that I also try to occupy all levels of the tank with fish, but try to confine the fish choices to similar sizes in groups, but different shapes and colors. Some solitary fish, that are different enough to stand alone and add interest are a Pacific red striped hog and a false perc. I am going to try a mandarin, but will have to be prepared to move him to a dedicated tank, if he is out competed for pods by the leopard wrasse trio and the CBB.

I try to do the same with my coral choices as I do with my fish. I try to get odd numbers of similar corals and of similar colors to get a uniform, as opposed to ''patchwork'' look, with show pieces of different shapes and forms for interest. For me, it is like living interior design and I also consider each fishes' impact on the system in terms of diet, bioload, temperament, adult size, and so on. Maybe I take all of the fun out of it, by planning so religiously and having such concrete ideas of what looks like it fits well together, but assembling a ''look'' with my livestock choices in the fun part to me and I love the planning phase. The 150g display is empty now, in my living room. While I save and buy all of the thousands of dollars worth of equipment , I have months to tinker with my ideas and play with stock list proposals. I am hoping to have the tank filled and stocked with some inverts and corals by Christmas. In the mean time, I am getting lots of ideas and soaking up knowledge from the board.
:D

Wonderful tank by the way!:)
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=13221507#post13221507 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by flashyleopard
You are correct, the PBT looks appropriate in your set-up. Some reasons it does not stand out garishly in your tank are:
A) You have a tank with more depth than mine or it least the illusion of depth.
B) Your backdrop of brightly colored corals sets a stage for colorful fish and allows it to stand out appropriately from the many pink-toned corals.
C) Your other fish choices lend to a bright blue fish.
The chromis and anthias allow for it, both in size and color, by mixing with the backdrop of coral colors and allowing the PBT to look appropriate.

In my purposed tank, I have already chosen several fish that are beautiful, but not b/c of striking color, but b/c of contrast. For example, banggaii cardinal, Copper banded butterfly, and a leopard wrasse. I also stick with odd numbers in ''fishscapeing'', when I can, so for me, my tank needed either three larger fish or a single, roaming, knockout specimen. I chose the CBB, a PbrownT, and the C.bionotatus, so far. The different shapes and pattern allow them to not be the largest fish in the tank and showy, but not so much, that they are the focus and the smaller fish get missed. For pops of color, I chose C. parasema or yellow tailed damsels. Very bright, contrast, and activity, also able to be kept in an odd number of three. Red firefish, are another odd numbered choice.
You can tell, that I also try to occupy all levels of the tank with fish, but try to confine the fish choices to similar sizes in groups, but different shapes and colors. Some solitary fish, that are different enough to stand alone and add interest are a Pacific red striped hog and a false perc. I am going to try a mandarin, but will have to be prepared to move him to a dedicated tank, if he is out competed for pods by the leopard wrasse trio and the CBB.

I try to do the same with my coral choices as I do with my fish. I try to get odd numbers of similar corals and of similar colors to get a uniform, as opposed to ''patchwork'' look, with show pieces of different shapes and forms for interest. For me, it is like living interior design and I also consider each fishes' impact on the system in terms of diet, bioload, temperament, adult size, and so on. Maybe I take all of the fun out of it, by planning so religiously and having such concrete ideas of what looks like it fits well together, but assembling a ''look'' with my livestock choices in the fun part to me and I love the planning phase. The 150g display is empty now, in my living room. While I save and buy all of the thousands of dollars worth of equipment , I have months to tinker with my ideas and play with stock list proposals. I am hoping to have the tank filled and stocked with some inverts and corals by Christmas. In the mean time, I am getting lots of ideas and soaking up knowledge from the board.
:D

Wonderful tank by the way!:)

WOW, My head is spinning just reading that. They are just fish after all:lol: .
 
<a href=showthread.php?s=&postid=13224641#post13224641 target=_blank>Originally posted</a> by jpa0741
WOW, My head is spinning just reading that. They are just fish after all:lol: .


And it gets worse. I plan every species, from coral to CUC to be from the Indo Pacific. The only excpetions are gorgonians, b/c the photsynthetic ones from the Indo Pacific are never exported and I have to have them....they are my favorite corals. Even they are chosen to ''look'' Indo Pacific....lol I'll admit, I'm a bit neurotic, when it comes to tank stocking, but I have done everything, from dart frog terrariums to 21' walk-in chameleon enclosures. I have to impress myself and it gets harder and harder, the more I accomplish and the more I see in person. I am glad I have only snorkeled in Florida and never seen a real reef, b/c I would go really nuts then, b/c then I wouldn't just be going off of my idea of what nature would look like, I'd know and nothing less would pass. I'm passionate...yep... definitley dove in head first.:D
 
This is the most difficult fish I have to get clear pictures of. They all come out with him looking black so I have to sacrifice a little bit of noise to get his true colors to show.....either that or I need to get better which is likely the case.

i havent tried in a while. I might get the camera out tomorrow and see what I can do......


chh1.jpg


ccch.jpg
 
Last edited:
Back
Top